ReviewWorld journal of urology2017
Stones in special situations.
Review in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment and validation of a risk scoring model for predicting the risk of bladder stones in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Preference for diagnosing and treating renal colic during pregnancy: a survey among Chinese urologists.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Management of Kidney Stone Disease in Pregnancy: A Practical and Evidence-Based Approach.Current urology reports · 2022Review
- ALARA in Urology: Steps to Minimise Radiation Exposure During All Parts of the Endourological Journey.Current urology reports · 2022Review
- Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Endoscopic intact removal of medium-size- or multiple bladder stones with the use of transvesical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.World journal of urology · 2019Article
- Bladder Stone in Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.The American journal of case reports · 2018Review
- Contemporary best practice urolithiasis in pregnancy.Therapeutic advances in urology · 2018Review
- Update from third international consultation on stone disease.World journal of urology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are several special situations in which urinary lithiasis presents management challenges to the urologist. An in-depth knowledge of the pathophysiology, unique anatomy, and treatment options is crucial in order to maintain good health in these patients. In this review, we summarize the current literature on the management of the following scenarios: bladder stones, stones in bowel disease, during pregnancy, in association with renal anomalies, with skeletal deformities, in urinary diversions, and in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28271156What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.