ArticleBiomedical optics express2017
Ultra-fast line-field low coherence holographic elastography using spatial phase shifting.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Review
- Ultrafast line-field holographic elastography with single excitation for corneal biomechanical characterization.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Wave-based optical coherence elastography: The 10-year perspective.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2022Article
- Ultra-fast dynamic line-field optical coherence elastography.Optics letters · 2021Article
- Enhanced medical diagnosis for dOCTors: a perspective of optical coherence tomography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2021Review
- A New Pattern Quality Assessment Criterion and Defocusing Degree Determination of Laser Speckle Correlation Method.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Laser-induced elastic wave classification: thermoelastic versus ablative regimes for all-optical elastography applications.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Article
- Longitudinal elastic wave imaging using nanobomb optical coherence elastography.Optics letters · 2019Article
- En face optical coherence tomography: a technology review [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
- Line-Field Optical Coherence Tomography as a tool for In vitro characterization of corneal biomechanics under physiological pressures.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Nanobomb optical coherence elastography.Optics letters · 2018Article
- Biomechanical assessment of myocardial infarction using optical coherence elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2018Article
- Common-path phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography provides enhanced phase stability and detection sensitivity for dynamic elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2017Article
- Holography applications toward medical field: An overview.The Indian journal of radiology & imagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optical coherence elastography (OCE) is an emerging technique for quantifying tissue biomechanical properties. Generally, OCE relies on point-by-point scanning. However, long acquisition times make point-by-point scanning unfeasible for clinical use. Here we demonstrate a noncontact single shot line-field low coherence holography system utilizing an automatic Hilbert transform analysis based on a spatial phase shifting technique. Spatio-temporal maps of elastic wave propagation were acquired with only one air-pulse excitation and used to quantify wave velocity and sample mechanical properties at a line rate of 200 kHz. Results obtained on phantoms were correlated with data from mechanical testing. Finally, the stiffness of porcine cornea at different intraocular pressures was also quantified
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.