Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270972›Full record

ReviewBiomedical optics express2017

Olivier Thouvenin, Kate Grieve, Peng Xiao, Clement Apelian, A Claude Boccara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical optics express, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Deep learning extended depth-of-field microscope for fast and slide-free histology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. High-resolutionBiomedical optics express · 2020
    Article
  15. Crosstalk-free volumetricBiomedical optics express · 2019
    Article
  16. Ten Years of Gabor-Domain Optical Coherence Microscopy.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olivier ThouveninInstitut Langevin ESPCI, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR7587 1rue Jussieu, Paris F75005, France.
Kate GrieveCHNO des Quinze Vingts/Institut de la Vision, 28 rue de Charenton, Paris F75012, France.
Peng XiaoInstitut Langevin ESPCI, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR7587 1rue Jussieu, Paris F75005, France.
Clement ApelianInstitut Langevin ESPCI, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR7587 1rue Jussieu, Paris F75005, France; LLTech Pépinière Paris Santé Cochin 29 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques Paris F75014, France.
A Claude BoccaraInstitut Langevin ESPCI, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR7587 1rue Jussieu, Paris F75005, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

(120.5820) Scattering measurements(170.1650) Coherence imaging(170.4580) Optical diagnostics for medicine(180.1655) Coherence tomography(180.3170) Interference microscopy

Identifiers

PMID28270972
PMCPMC5330590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.