Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270914›Full record

ReviewJournal of intensive care2017

Sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction and β-adrenergic blockade therapy for sepsis.

Takeshi Suzuki, Yuta Suzuki, Jun Okuda, Takuya Kurazumi, Tomohiro Suhara, Tomomi Ueda, Hiromasa Nagata, Hiroshi Morisaki

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of intensive care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Targeted Heart Rate Control in Sepsis: A Promising Path or a Double-edged Sword?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takeshi SuzukiDepartment of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care Unit, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582 Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3703-9323
Yuta SuzukiDepartment of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care Unit, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582 Japan.
Jun OkudaDepartment of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care Unit, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582 Japan.
Takuya KurazumiDepartment of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care Unit, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582 Japan.
Tomohiro SuharaDepartment of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care Unit, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582 Japan.
Tomomi UedaDepartment of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care Unit, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582 Japan.
Hiromasa NagataDepartment of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care Unit, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582 Japan.
Hiroshi MorisakiDepartment of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care Unit, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582 Japan.
Keio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in medical care, mortality due to sepsis, defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, remains high. Fluid resuscitation and vasopressors are the first-line treatment for sepsis in order to optimize hemodynamic instability caused by vasodilation and increased vascular permeability. However, these therapies, aimed at maintaining blood pressure and blood flow to vital organs, could have deleterious cardiac effects, as cardiomyocyte damage occurs in the early stages of sepsis. Recent experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that a number of factors contribute to sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction and the degree of cardiac dysfunction is one of the major prognostic factors of sepsis. Therefore, strategies to prevent further cardiomyocyte damage could be of crucial importance in improving the outcome of sepsis. Among many factors causing sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction, sympathetic nerve overstimulation, due to endogenous elevated catecholamine levels and exogenous catecholamine administration, is thought to play a major role. β-adrenergic blockade therapy is widely used for ischemic heart disease and chronic heart failure and in the prevention of cardiovascular events in high-risk perioperative patients undergoing major surgery. It has also been shown to restore cardiac function in experimental septic animal models. In a single-center randomized controlled trial, esmolol infusion in patients with septic shock with persistent tachycardia reduced the 28-day mortality. Furthermore, it is likely that β-adrenergic blockade therapy may result in further beneficial effects in patients with sepsis, such as the reduction of inflammatory cytokine production, suppression of hypermetabolic status, maintenance of glucose homeostasis, and improvement of coagulation disorders. Recent accumulating evidence suggests that β-adrenergic blockade could be an attractive therapy to improve the prognosis of sepsis. We await a large multicenter randomized clinical trial to confirm the beneficial effects of β-adrenergic blockade therapy in sepsis, of which mortality is still high.

Indexed as

SepsisSepsis-induced cardiac dysfunctionβ-adrenergic blockade therapy

Identifiers

PMID28270914
PMCPMC5335779
OpenAlexW2593295967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.