Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270894›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2017

The Effect of Individualized Versus Standardized Parenteral Nutrition on Body Weight in Very Preterm Infants.

Vincent H M Evering, Peter Andriessen, Carola E P M Duijsters, Jeroen Brogtrop, Luc J J Derijks

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03693287 (Personalized Versus Standardized Parenteral Nutrition for Preterm Infants With a Birth Weight Greater Than 1250 Grams), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03693287 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Personalized Versus Standardized Parenteral Nutrition for Preterm Infants With a Birth Weight Greater Than 1250 Grams: a Multicenter Randomized Phase IV Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOspedali Riuniti AnconaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled150ConditionsInfant,Premature, Parenteral Nutrition, GrowthArmsStandardized-parenteral nutrition (S-PN), Personalized-parenteral nutrition (P-PN)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Analysis of factors driving variations in neonatal parenteral nutrition over a decade: A retrospective study.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Pharmaceutical Aspects of Artificial Nutrition.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincent H M EveringDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Peter AndriessenDepartment of Pediatrics, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands; Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Carola E P M DuijstersDepartment of Pediatrics, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Jeroen BrogtropDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Luc J J DerijksDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was designed to evaluate whether standardizing total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is at least non-inferior to TPN with individualized composition in premature infants with a gestational age (GA) < 32 weeks.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, all preterm born in or transferred to Maxima Medical Center (MMC) within 24 hours after birth with a GA < 32 weeks were included. The individualized group (2011) was compared to the partially standardized group (2012) and completely standardized group (2014) consequently. The primary endpoint was difference in growth. Secondary endpoints included differences in electrolyte concentrations.

resultsA total of 299 preterm were included in this study. When comparing weight gain, the infants in the (partially) standardized group demonstrated significantly (P < 0.05) less weight loss during the first days of life and grew faster subsequently in the following days than the individualized TPN regimen. Furthermore, significant differences in abnormal serum sodium, chloride, calcium, creatinine, magnesium and triglycerides values were demonstrated.

conclusionTPN with a (partially) standardized composition revealed to be at least non-inferior to TPN with an individualized composition.

Indexed as

Parenteral nutritionPreterm infantWeight gain

Identifiers

PMID28270894
PMCPMC5330777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.