Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270886›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine research2017

Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Radiation-Induced Cerebral Necrosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Durim Delishaj, Stefano Ursino, Francesco Pasqualetti, Agostino Cristaudo, Mirco Cosottini, Maria Grazia Fabrini, Fabiola Paiar

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)†.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2018
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Incidence of radiation necrosis following different radiotherapy fractionation schedules for intracranial meningiomas.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Palliative care for children with central nervous system tumors: results of a Spanish multicenter study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Durim DelishajDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy.
Stefano UrsinoDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy.
Francesco PasqualettiDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy.
Agostino CristaudoDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy.
Mirco CosottiniNeuroradiology Unit, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy.
Maria Grazia FabriniDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy.
Fabiola PaiarDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation necrosis (RN) of brain tissue is a serious late complication of brain irradiation and recently bevacizumab has been suggested as treatment option of RN. There is a lack of data in the literature regarding the effectiveness of bevacizumab for the treatment of RN. The purpose of this review was to perform a comprehensive analysis of all reported cases using bevacizumab for the treatment of brain RN. In September 2016, we performed a comprehensive literature search of the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library. The research for the review was conducted using a combination of the keywords "radiation necrosis", "radiotherapy" and "bevacizumab" alongside the fields comprising article title, abstract and keywords. Randomized trials, non-randomized trials, prospective studies, retrospective studies and single case reports were included in the review. Our research generated 21 studies and 125 cases where bevacizumab had been used for the treatment of RN. The median follow-up was 8 months and the most frequent bevacizumab dose used was 7.5 mg/kg for 2 weeks with a median of four cycles. Low-dose bevacizumab resulted in effectiveness with improvement in both clinical and radiographic response. The median decrease in T1 contrast enhancement and in T2/FLAIR signal abnormality was 64% and 60%, respectively. A reduction in steroidal therapy was observed in majority of patients treated. Based on the data of our review, bevacizumab appears to be a promising agent for the treatment of brain RN. Future prospective studies are required to evaluate the role of bevacizumab in RN and to define the optimal scheduling, dosage and duration of therapy.

Indexed as

BevacizumabBrain irradiationBrain metastasesStereotactic radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28270886
PMCPMC5330769
OpenAlexW2589766554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.