Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270786›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2017

Patients' Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment.

Johannes A C Laferton, Tobias Kube, Stefan Salzmann, Charlotte J Auer, Meike C Shedden-Mora

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 123 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04502121 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Optimization of Cardiac Valve Patients' Expectations - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2020 to 2023Enrolled89ConditionsCardiac Valve DiseaseArmsEXPECT: Preoperative optimization of cardiac valve patient's expectations
NCT04669379 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Optimization of Patient's Expectations by the Use of an Online-Tool - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2021 to 2022Enrolled29ConditionsPatients Undergoing SurgeryArmsEXPECT: Preoperative optimization of patient's expectations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Does outcome expectancy predict outcomes in online depression prevention? Secondary analysis of randomised-controlled trials.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Trial
  11. A Psychometric Evaluation of the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale (SETS) in the Context of a Smoking Cessation Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johannes A C LafertonDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule BerlinBerlin, Germany; Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of MarburgMarburg, Germany.
Tobias KubeDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg Marburg, Germany.
Stefan SalzmannDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg Marburg, Germany.
Charlotte J AuerDivision of Psychotherapy and Psychiatry, University Hospital Lübeck Lübeck, Germany.
Meike C Shedden-MoraDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients' expectations in the context of medical treatment represent a growing area of research, with accumulating evidence suggesting their influence on health outcomes across a variety of medical conditions. However, the aggregation of evidence is complicated due to an inconsistent and disintegrated application of expectation constructs and the heterogeneity of assessment strategies. Therefore, based on current expectation concepts, this critical review provides an integrated model of patients' expectations in medical treatment. Moreover, we review existing assessment tools in the context of the integrative model of expectations and provide recommendations for improving future assessment. The integrative model includes expectations regarding treatment and patients' treatment-related behavior. Treatment and behavior outcome expectations can relate to aspects regarding benefits and side effects and can refer to internal (e.g., symptoms) and external outcomes (e.g., reactions of others). Furthermore, timeline, structural and process expectations are important aspects with respect to medical treatment. Additionally, generalized expectations such as generalized self-efficacy or optimism have to be considered. Several instruments assessing different aspects of expectations in medical treatment can be found in the literature. However, many were developed without conceptual standardization and psychometric evaluation. Moreover, they merely assess single aspects of expectations, thus impeding the integration of evidence regarding the differential aspects of expectations. As many instruments assess treatment-specific expectations, they are not comparable between different conditions. To generate a more comprehensive understanding of expectation effects in medical treatments, we recommend that future research should apply standardized, psychometrically evaluated measures, assessing multidimensional aspects of patients' expectations that are applicable across various medical treatments. In the future, more research is needed on the interrelation of different expectation concepts as well as on factors influencing patients' expectations of illness and treatment. Considering the importance of patients' expectations for health outcomes across many medical conditions, an integrated understanding and assessment of such expectations might facilitate interventions aiming to optimize patients' expectations in order to improve health outcomes.

Indexed as

assessmentexpectationsoperationalizationoptimismoutcome expectancyplacebo effectself-efficacytreatment

Identifiers

PMID28270786
PMCPMC5318458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.