ArticleFrontiers in psychology2017
Auditory and Non-Auditory Contributions for Unaided Speech Recognition in Noise as a Function of Hearing Aid Use.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Oldenburg Hearing Health Record (OHHR).Scientific data · 2025Article
- Differential sensitivity to speech rhythms in young and older adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Extending the audiogram with loudness growth: The complementarity of electric and acoustic hearing in bimodal patients.PloS one · 2023Article
- Interpretable Clinical Decision Support System for Audiology Based on Predicted Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The development of a Self-Rated ICF-based questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool) to evaluate Hearing, Communication, and Conversation disability: Multinational experts' and patients' perspectives.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Expert validation of prediction models for a clinical decision-support system in audiology.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- A flexible data-driven audiological patient stratification method for deriving auditory profiles.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Immediate Effects of (Simulated) Age-Related Hearing Loss on Cognitive Processing and Performance for the Backward-Digit-Span Task.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Auditory Tests for Characterizing Hearing Deficits in Listeners With Various Hearing Abilities: The BEAR Test Battery.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020Article
- Objective and Subjective Auditory Effects of Traumatic Brain Injury and Blast Exposure in Service Members and Veterans.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Predicting Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) as Interpretable Intermediate Representation in a Clinical Decision-Support System for Audiology.Frontiers in digital health · 2020Article
- Does hearing aid use affect audiovisual integration in mild hearing impairment?Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- Rapid Profiling of Loudness Among Older Adults.Ear and hearingArticle
- Objective Comparison of Auditory Profiles Using Manifold Learning and Intrinsic Measures.Trends in hearingArticle
- Advantages of Fluctuating Noise for Measuring Speech Intelligibility in Listeners With Hearing Loss.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differences in understanding speech in noise among hearing-impaired individuals cannot be explained entirely by hearing thresholds alone, suggesting the contribution of other factors beyond standard auditory ones as derived from the audiogram. This paper reports two analyses addressing individual differences in the explanation of unaided speech-in-noise performance among
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.