Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270776›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2017

A Quantitative Relationship between Signal Detection in Attention and Approach/Avoidance Behavior.

Vijay Viswanathan, John P Sheppard, Byoung W Kim, Christopher L Plantz, Hao Ying, Myung J Lee, Kalyan Raman, Frank J Mulhern, Martin P Block, Bobby Calder and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vijay ViswanathanMedill Integrated Marketing Communications, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Applied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA.
John P SheppardApplied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Warren Wright Adolescent Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicago, IL, USA.
Byoung W KimApplied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Warren Wright Adolescent Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicago, IL, USA; Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Genetics, and Mood and Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, USA; MGH Center for Translational Research in Prescription Drug Abuse, Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, USA; Northwestern University and Massachusetts General Hospital Phenotype Genotype Project in Addiction and Mood DisordersChicago, IL, USA.
Christopher L PlantzDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL, USA.
Hao YingApplied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering, Wayne State UniversityDetroit, MI, USA.
Myung J LeeApplied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Warren Wright Adolescent Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicago, IL, USA; Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Genetics, and Mood and Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, USA; MGH Center for Translational Research in Prescription Drug Abuse, Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, USA; Northwestern University and Massachusetts General Hospital Phenotype Genotype Project in Addiction and Mood DisordersChicago, IL, USA.
Kalyan RamanMedill Integrated Marketing Communications, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Applied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA.
Frank J MulhernMedill Integrated Marketing Communications, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Applied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA.
Martin P BlockMedill Integrated Marketing Communications, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Applied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA.
Bobby CalderApplied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Department of Marketing, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA.
Sang LeeApplied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Genetics, and Mood and Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, USA; MGH Center for Translational Research in Prescription Drug Abuse, Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, USA; Northwestern University and Massachusetts General Hospital Phenotype Genotype Project in Addiction and Mood DisordersChicago, IL, USA.
Dale T MortensenDepartment of Economics, Northwestern University College of Arts and Sciences Evanston, IL, USA.
Anne J BloodApplied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Genetics, and Mood and Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, USA; MGH Center for Translational Research in Prescription Drug Abuse, Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, USA; Northwestern University and Massachusetts General Hospital Phenotype Genotype Project in Addiction and Mood DisordersChicago, IL, USA.
Hans C BreiterApplied Neuromarketing Consortium, Medill, Kellogg, and Feinberg Schools, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL, USA; Warren Wright Adolescent Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicago, IL, USA; Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Genetics, and Mood and Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, USA; MGH Center for Translational Research in Prescription Drug Abuse, Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, USA; Northwestern University and Massachusetts General Hospital Phenotype Genotype Project in Addiction and Mood DisordersChicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines how the domains of reward and attention, which are often studied as independent processes, in fact interact at a systems level. We operationalize divided attention with a continuous performance task and variables from signal detection theory (SDT), and reward/aversion with a keypress task measuring approach/avoidance in the framework of relative preference theory (RPT). Independent experiments with the same subjects showed a significant association between one SDT and two RPT variables, visualized as a three-dimensional structure. Holding one of these three variables constant, further showed a significant relationship between a loss aversion-like metric from the approach/avoidance task, and the response bias observed during the divided attention task. These results indicate that a more liberal response bias under signal detection (i.e., a higher tolerance for noise, resulting in a greater proportion of false alarms) is associated with higher "loss aversion." Furthermore, our functional model suggests a mechanism for processing constraints with divided attention and reward/aversion. Together, our results argue for a systematic relationship between divided attention and reward/aversion processing in humans.

Indexed as

attentioniterative modelingneuroeconomicspsychophysicsrelative preferencerewardsignal detection theory

Identifiers

PMID28270776
PMCPMC5318395
OpenAlexW2580245139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.