Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270722›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2017

Does adjuvant radiation therapy benefit women with small mammography-detected breast cancers?

K Jerzak, N Dudalski, K Pritchard, P Sun, S A Narod

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

K JerzakDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto.
N DudalskiMcMaster University, Hamilton.
K PritchardDepartment of Medicine, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto;; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto; and.
P SunWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON.
S A NarodDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto; and; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON.
University of Toronto · CAMcMaster University · CAPublic Health Ontario · CAWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with small nonpalpable breast tumours have an excellent prognosis. The benefit of radiotherapy in this group of low-risk women is unknown.

methodsA cohort of 1595 women with stages i-iii invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery were followed for local recurrence. Using t-tests, baseline demographic data and tumour characteristics were compared for the women who had palpable (

resultsAmong women with a nonpalpable tumour, the 15-year actuarial rates of local recurrence were, respectively, 13.9% and 18.3% for those treated and not treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (hr: 0.65; 95%ci: 0.40 to 1.06;

conclusionsOur results suggest that women with small (<1 cm) screen-detected nonpalpable breast cancers likely derive little benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy; however, an adequately powered randomized trial would be required to make definitive conclusions.

Indexed as

Breast cancerpalpable breast tumoursradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID28270722
PMCPMC5330626
OpenAlexW2591791378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.