Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270719›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2017

Listening through narratives: using a narrative approach when discussing fertility preservation options with young cancer patients.

S I G Roher, J Gibson, B E Gibson, A A Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S I G RoherJoint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.
J GibsonJoint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.
B E GibsonDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, and Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; and.
A A GuptaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
University of Toronto · CAHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital · CASickKids Foundation · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite clinical practice guideline recommendations mandating that fertility preservation be discussed with young cancer patients, many providers fail to initiate such discussions with adolescents. Researchers and clinicians often focus on system-level changes to improve access to fertility preservation for adolescents and young adults in Canada. However, little of the available information considers the

Indexed as

adolescent and young adult oncologyFertility preservationnarrative medicinepatient-centred care

Identifiers

PMID28270719
PMCPMC5330623
OpenAlexW2592097805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.