Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270567›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Whole-Brain Neural Dynamics of Probabilistic Reward Prediction.

Dominik R Bach, Mkael Symmonds, Gareth Barnes, Raymond J Dolan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Decoding the processing stages of mental arithmetic with magnetoencephalography.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Dominik R BachWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3 GB, United Kingdom, dominik.bach@uzh.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-3717-2036
Mkael SymmondsWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3 GB, United Kingdom.
Gareth BarnesWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3 GB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5396-7712
Raymond J DolanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3 GB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9356-761X
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K005464/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 091593/Z/10/ZWellcome Trust 098362/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting future reward is paramount to performing an optimal action. Although a number of brain areas are known to encode such predictions, a detailed account of how the associated representations evolve over time is lacking. Here, we address this question using human magnetoencephalography (MEG) and multivariate analyses of instantaneous activity in reconstructed sources. We overtrained participants on a simple instrumental reward learning task where geometric cues predicted a distribution of possible rewards, from which a sample was revealed 2000 ms later. We show that predicted mean reward (i.e., expected value), and predicted reward variability (i.e., economic risk), are encoded distinctly. Early on, representations of mean reward are seen in parietal and visual areas, and later in frontal regions with orbitofrontal cortex emerging last. Strikingly, an encoding of reward variability emerges simultaneously in parietal/sensory and frontal sources and later than mean reward encoding. An orbitofrontal variability encoding emerged around the same time as that seen for mean reward. Crucially, cross-prediction showed that mean reward and variability representations are distinct and also revealed that instantaneous representations become more stable over time. Across sources, the best fitting metric for variability signals was coefficient of variation (rather than SD or variance), but distinct best metrics were seen for individual brain regions. Our data demonstrate how a dynamic encoding of probabilistic reward prediction unfolds in the brain both in time and space.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalRewardAdultBrainFemaleForecastingHumansMagnetoencephalographyMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung Adultdecodingdynamic encodingencodingmagnetoencephalographyreward prediction

Identifiers

PMID28270567
PMCPMC5394896
OpenAlexW2593229867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.