Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270406›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine2017

AKR1B1 promotes basal-like breast cancer progression by a positive feedback loop that activates the EMT program.

Xuebiao Wu, Xiaoli Li, Qiang Fu, Qianhua Cao, Xingyu Chen, Mengjie Wang, Jie Yu, Jingpei Long, Jun Yao, Huixin Liu and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ERCC1/NGFR affects prognosis in basal-like breast cancer.European journal of medical research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuebiao WuDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Xiaoli LiDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Qiang FuDepartment of Immunology, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6932-7103
Qianhua CaoDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Xingyu ChenDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Mengjie WangDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Jie YuDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Jingpei LongDepartment of Breast Surgery, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Jun YaoDepartment of Neuro-oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030.
Huixin LiuDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Danping WangDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7555-038X
Ruocen LiaoDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Chenfang DongDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China chenfangdong@zju.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2964-5876
Zhejiang University · CNBinzhou Medical University · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) is associated with high-grade, distant metastasis and poor prognosis. Elucidating the determinants of aggressiveness in BLBC may facilitate the development of novel interventions for this challenging disease. In this study, we show that aldo-keto reductase 1 member B1 (AKR1B1) overexpression highly correlates with BLBC and predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. Mechanistically, Twist2 transcriptionally induces AKR1B1 expression, leading to nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation. In turn, NF-κB up-regulates Twist2 expression, thereby fulfilling a positive feedback loop that activates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition program and enhances cancer stem cell (CSC)-like properties in BLBC. AKR1B1 expression promotes, whereas AKR1B1 knockdown inhibits, tumorigenicity and metastasis. Importantly, epalrestat, an AKR1B1 inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of diabetic complications, significantly suppresses CSC properties, tumorigenicity, and metastasis of BLBC cells. Together, our study identifies AKR1B1 as a key modulator of tumor aggressiveness and suggests that pharmacologic inhibition of AKR1B1 has the potential to become a valuable therapeutic strategy for BLBC.

Indexed as

Epithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionAldehyde ReductaseAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell MovementDinoprostDisease ProgressionFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleHumansMiceNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplastic Stem CellsNF-kappa BTranscription Factor RelAAKR1B1 protein, humanAldehyde ReductaseDinoprostNF-kappa BRELA protein, humanTranscription Factor RelATwist-Related Protein 2

Identifiers

PMID28270406
PMCPMC5379972
OpenAlexW2593371615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.