ReviewBMB reports2017
Cancer stem cell surface markers on normal stem cells.
Review in BMB reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 187 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
187 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 335 citations in OpenAlex.
- The metabolic addiction of cancer stem cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Prognostic value of octamer binding transcription factor 4 for patients with solid tumors: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Expression of CD44 and the survival in glioma: a meta-analysis.Bioscience reports · 2020Pooled it
- Results of the feasibility study of clinical trials of the new cancer treatment technology Karanahan for patients with advanced breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- The metabolic profiles of cancer stem cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- From Signaling Pathways to Combination Therapy: Bioactive Compounds against Cancer Stem Cells.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Glycosphingolipids in human abdominal leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Engineered Extracellular Vesicles for Cancer Stem Cell Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- From Environmental Risk to Cancer Stemness: Epigenetic Regulation in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Synthetic lethality and DNA damage response targeting in cancer stem cells: a comprehensive review.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Enrichment of colon cancer stem cells via polymeric porous filters with different zeta potentials.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Strict retroelement regulation is frequently lost following cancer transformation and generates a promising reservoir of cancer biomarkers.Mobile DNA · 2025Article
- Emerging nanoparticles that target and eliminate cancer stem cells.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- The Role of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase-like Orphan Receptor 1 (ROR1) in Cancer Stem Cell Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cancer stem cells: landscape, challenges and emerging therapeutic innovations.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Bioinformatics tools and experimental analysis combination for production of specific scFv against CD133.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Cancer Stem Cells Connecting to Immunotherapy: Key Insights, Challenges, and Potential Treatment Opportunities.Cancers · 2025Review
- Unraveling the triad of hypoxia, cancer cell stemness, and drug resistance.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- A Comprehensive Review of the Mechanisms and Clinical Development of Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis has captured the attention of many scientists. It is believed that elimination of CSCs could possibly eradicate the whole cancer. CSC surface markers provide molecular targeted therapies for various cancers, using therapeutic antibodies specific for the CSC surface markers. Various CSC surface markers have been identified and published. Interestingly, most of the markers used to identify CSCs are derived from surface markers present on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) or adult stem cells. In this review, we classify the currently known 40 CSC surface markers into 3 different categories, in terms of their expression in hESCs, adult stem cells, and normal tissue cells. Approximately 73% of current CSC surface markers appear to be present on embryonic or adult stem cells, and they are rarely expressed on normal tissue cells. The remaining CSC surface markers are considerably expressed even in normal tissue cells, and some of them have been extensively validated as CSC surface markers by various research groups. We discuss the significance of the categorized CSC surface markers, and provide insight into why surface markers on hESCs are an attractive source to find novel surface markers on CSCs. [BMB Reports 2017; 50(6): 285-298].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.