Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270252›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2017

Differences between migrants and Spanish-born population through the HIV care cascade, Catalonia: an analysis using multiple data sources.

J Reyes-Urueña, C Campbell, C Hernando, N Vives, C Folch, L Ferrer, L Fernández-López, A Esteve, J Casabona

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. [Knowledge, access and use of the health system by migrant adolescents in Chile: results of an exploratory study].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J Reyes-UrueñaCentre for Epidemiological Studies on HIV/STI of Catalonia (CEEISCAT), Agencia de Salut Publica de Catalunya (ASPC),Generalitat de Catalunya,Badalona,Spain.
C CampbellCentre for Epidemiological Studies on HIV/STI of Catalonia (CEEISCAT), Agencia de Salut Publica de Catalunya (ASPC),Generalitat de Catalunya,Badalona,Spain.
C HernandoCentre for Epidemiological Studies on HIV/STI of Catalonia (CEEISCAT), Agencia de Salut Publica de Catalunya (ASPC),Generalitat de Catalunya,Badalona,Spain.
N VivesCentre for Epidemiological Studies on HIV/STI of Catalonia (CEEISCAT), Agencia de Salut Publica de Catalunya (ASPC),Generalitat de Catalunya,Badalona,Spain.
C FolchCentre for Epidemiological Studies on HIV/STI of Catalonia (CEEISCAT), Agencia de Salut Publica de Catalunya (ASPC),Generalitat de Catalunya,Badalona,Spain.
L FerrerCentre for Epidemiological Studies on HIV/STI of Catalonia (CEEISCAT), Agencia de Salut Publica de Catalunya (ASPC),Generalitat de Catalunya,Badalona,Spain.
L Fernández-LópezCentre for Epidemiological Studies on HIV/STI of Catalonia (CEEISCAT), Agencia de Salut Publica de Catalunya (ASPC),Generalitat de Catalunya,Badalona,Spain.
A EsteveCentre for Epidemiological Studies on HIV/STI of Catalonia (CEEISCAT), Agencia de Salut Publica de Catalunya (ASPC),Generalitat de Catalunya,Badalona,Spain.
J CasabonaCentre for Epidemiological Studies on HIV/STI of Catalonia (CEEISCAT), Agencia de Salut Publica de Catalunya (ASPC),Generalitat de Catalunya,Badalona,Spain.
Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESInstitut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migrants are considered a key group at risk for HIV infection. This study describes differences between migrants and the Spanish-born population as they progress through the HIV care cascade in Catalonia, Spain. This study found that among people reached by prevention activities, migrants had a higher number of barriers to access HIV testing services than Spanish-born people, driven primarily by shared risk factors. Between 2001 and 2013, 9829 new HIV diagnoses were reported in Catalonia, the proportion of migrants increasing from 24% in 2001 to 41% in 2013. Compared with Spanish-born people, migrants had a higher proportion of women at diagnosis (24·6% vs. 16·7%), and were younger (median age of 33 vs. 37). The most frequent at-risk population was MSM (men who have sex with men) in both migrants and Spanish-born people, (40% and 43%, respectively), although there were significant differences by region of origin. People from sub-Saharan Africa had the highest proportion of late diagnosis (63·7%). Compared with the Spanish-born population, migrants on follow-up had a lower proportion of people on antiretroviral therapy (ART) (93·7% vs. 90·8%, P < 0·001) and with viral suppression (87·2% vs. 82·9%, P < 0·001). Migrants have higher number of barriers to access HIV testing services, lower retention rates and proportions on ART as compared with Spanish-born people, these differences not being uniform between migrants from different regions.

Indexed as

Transients and MigrantsAdolescentAdultAgedDelayed DiagnosisFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSpainYoung AdultCascadeepidemiologyhealth servicesHIVinformation systemmigrant

Identifiers

PMID28270252
PMCPMC9203328
OpenAlexW2591925517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.