Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28270181›Full record

Trial reportChinese journal of cancer2017

Weekly taxane-anthracycline combination regimen versus tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Qiu-Wen Tan, Ting Luo, Hong Zheng, Ting-Lun Tian, Ping He, Jie Chen, He-Lin Zeng, Qing Lv

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chinese journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qiu-Wen TanDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Ting LuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Hong ZhengDepartment of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Ting-Lun TianDepartment of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Ping HeDepartment of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
He-Lin ZengDepartment of Medical Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Qing LvDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China. lvqingwestchina@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtensive studies have confirmed the efficacy of taxanes in combination with anthracycline-based chemotherapy on breast cancer. However, few studies have assessed the efficacy of weekly taxane-anthracycline regimens on locally advanced breast cancer. This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a weekly taxane-anthracycline regimen with those of tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

methodsPatients with locally advanced breast cancer were randomized to receive 4-6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tri-weekly 5-fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen or weekly paclitaxel-epirubicin (PE) regimen. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Other endpoints included the clinical tumor response, breast-conserving surgery rate, and adverse events.

resultsBetween March 2010 and September 2013, 293 patients were randomized to the FEC (n = 151) and PE (n = 142) arms. The overall clinical response rate was significantly higher in the PE arm than in the FEC arm (76.06% vs. 59.95%, P = 0.001). Consistently, the post-chemotherapy pathologic T and N stages were significantly lower in the PE arm than in the FEC arm (P < 0.001). However, the pCR rate was similar in the two arms (10.61% vs. 12.31%, P = 0.665). Overall, 36 (27.27%) patients in the FEC arm and 6 (35.28%) in the PE arm were qualified for breast-conserving surgery. Most adverse events were comparable in both arms, with more severe neutropenia in the PE arm than in the FEC arm (11.97% vs. 5.96%, P = 0.031).

conclusionsIn patients with locally advanced breast cancer, weekly PE was not superior to FEC in terms of pCR. However, weekly PE has a higher response rate and superior down-staging effects. On this account, the PE regimen may be considered an alternative option for locally advanced breast cancer. Long-term follow-up data are needed to confirm the efficacy of this regimen on locally advanced breast cancer. Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry, ChiCTR-TRC-10001043, September 21, 2014.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCyclophosphamideDrug Administration ScheduleEpirubicinFemaleFluorouracilHumansMiddle AgedPaclitaxelTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntineoplastic AgentsCyclophosphamideEpirubicinFluorouracilPaclitaxelAnthracyclineChemotherapyLocally advanced breast cancerNeoadjuvantRandomized clinical trialTaxanes

Identifiers

PMID28270181
PMCPMC5340016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.