ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2017
Non-invasive continuous monitoring of pro-oxidant effects of engineered nanoparticles on aquatic microorganisms.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oxidative stress and osmolyte induction caused by a Thiobencarb nano-emulsion in the freshwater alga Chlorella vulgaris.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial activity of chitosan, alginate, pectin, and cellulose-based biopolymer composites with silver, copper oxide, and zinc oxide nanoparticles.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Real-time monitoring of cellular oxidative stress during aerosol sampling: a proof of concept study.Drug and chemical toxicology · 2022Article
- Synthesis, Characterization, and Antiproliferative Effect of CuO-TiOBioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2022Article
- Self-Assembled Antimicrobial Nanomaterials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Review
- Swiss National Research Programme "Opportunities and Risks of Nanomaterials" (NRP 64): key findings.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are key drivers for the development of highly sophisticated new technologies. As all new attainments, the rapidly increasing used of ENMs raise concerns about their safety for the environment and humans. There is growing evidence showing that if engineered nanomaterials are released into the environment, there is a possibility that they could cause harm to aquatic microorganisms. Among the divers effects triggering their toxicity the ability of ENMs to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) capable of oxidizing biomolecules is currently considered a central mechanism of toxicity. Therefore, development of sensitive tools for quantification of the ROS generation and oxidative stress are highly sought. After briefly introducing ENMs-induced ROS generation and oxidative stress in the aquatic microorganisms (AMOs), this overview paper focuses on a new optical biosensor allowing sensitive and dynamic measurements of H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.