ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2016
Adoption of a Nationwide Shared Medical Record in France: Lessons Learnt after 5 Years of Deployment.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do you Really Want to Know-Patient and Physician Attitudes of Physicians and English-Proficient Asian Patients toward Direct Release of Radiology Reports in Singapore.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Engagement with the national electronic health records by people with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- A Dose of Smart Medicine to Make America Healthy Again: A $1 Trillion Win for Health, Innovation, and the Nation.Cureus · 2025Article
- Defining re-implementation.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- The French Health Data Hub and the German Medical Informatics Initiatives: Two National Projects to Promote Data Sharing in Healthcare.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2019Article
- DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY: Opportunities and barriers for usage of personal health records in hospital - report from a -workshop of the Health Informatics Unit at the Royal -College of Physicians.Future healthcare journal · 2019Article
- Access and Disclosure of Personal Health Information: A Challenging Privacy Landscape in 2016-2018.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2018Review
- Technology and Policy Challenges in the Adoption and Operation of Health Information Exchange Systems.Healthcare informatics research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Information sharing among health practitioners, either for coordinated or unscheduled care, is necessary to guarantee care quality and patient safety. In most countries, nationwide programs have provided tools to support information sharing, from centralized care records to health information exchange between electronic health records (EHRs). The French personal medical record (DMP) is a centralized patient-controlled record, created according to the opt-in consent model. It contains the documents health practitioners voluntarily push into the DMP from their EHRs. Five years after the launching of the program in December 2010, there were nearly 570,000 DMPs covering only 1.5% of the target population in December 2015. Reasons for this poor level of adoption are discussed in the perspective of other countries' initiatives. The new French governmental strategy for the DMP deployment in 2016 is outlined, with the implementation of measures similar to the US Meaningful Use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28269907PMC5333332What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.