Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28269877›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2016

Data-Driven Prediction of Beneficial Drug Combinations in Spontaneous Reporting Systems.

Ying Li, Ping Zhang, Zhaonan Sun, Jianying Hu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Mining Directional Drug Interaction Effects on Myopathy Using the FAERS Database.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying LiCenter for Computational Health, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, NY, USA.
Ping ZhangCenter for Computational Health, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, NY, USA.
Zhaonan SunCenter for Computational Health, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, NY, USA.
Jianying HuCenter for Computational Health, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, NY, USA.
IBM (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-market withdrawal of medications because of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) could result in loss of effective compounds which are effective for treating a specific disease but have unfavorable benefit-to- harm ratio. Recent therapeutic successes have renewed interest in drug combinations, which could work synergistically to improve therapeutic efficacy or work antagonistically to alleviate the risk of the ADRs. However, experimental screening approaches are costly and often can identify only a small number of drug combinations. Spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) routinely collect adverse drug events (ADEs) from patients on complex combinations of medications and provide an empirical and cost-effective source to detect unexpected beneficial drug combinations. In this paper, we proposed a novel data-driven method for the prediction of drug combinations where one drug could reduce the ADRs of the other, based on data from SRSs. The predictive model was shown to be effective using a commonly used evaluation approach in pharmacovigilance by constructing a known drug-drug interaction (DDI) reference standard. The method was applied to perform large-scale screening on SRS data for drug-ADR-drug triples where polypharmacy could potentially reduce the ADR. Analysis of the top ranking candidates showed high level of clinical validity.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug CombinationsDrug InteractionsDatabases, FactualDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansLogistic ModelsPharmacovigilancePolypharmacyPropensity ScoreROC CurveDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID28269877
PMCPMC5333241
OpenAlexW2620954934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.