Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28269863›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2016

Discordant patient pain level reporting between questionnaires and physician encounters of the same day.

David A Juckett, Fred N Davis, Mark Gostine, Eric P Kasten, Philip L Reed, Joseph Gardiner, Rebecca Risko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David A JuckettMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Fred N DavisProCare Systems, Inc., Grand Rapids, MI.
Mark GostineMichigan Pain Consultants, LLC, Grand Rapids, MI.
Eric P KastenMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Philip L ReedMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Joseph GardinerMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Rebecca RiskoProCare Systems, Inc., Grand Rapids, MI.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R21 HS022335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the consistency of pain reporting by patients in a community pain management practice in Michigan. We compared pain levels (range 0-10) entered by patients in questionnaires versus those provided during their face-to-face physician encounter on the same day. Both of these values were available for approximately 10,000 encounters during the study period (2010-2014). Two subpopulations of patients were identifiable. One was consistent in reporting worst or least pain levels on the questionnaire and during the provider encounter. The other was discordant. Factor analysis had previously identified severity scales for patient biopsychosocial characteristics derived from the full questionnaire. The two subpopulations differed in their factor profiles even though they had similar demographics. In general, pain reported directly to physicians was more correlated to biopsychosocial indicators. Pain self-reporting using questionnaires has often been assumed to be ground truth, but those obtained during the physician encounter may be more reliable.

Indexed as

Medical RecordsPain MeasurementSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesFemaleHumansMaleNatural Language ProcessingPain ManagementPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID28269863
PMCPMC5333309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.