ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2016
A fresh perspective on dissecting action into discrete submotions.
Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reaching trajectories unravel modality-dependent temporal dynamics of the automatic process in the Simon task: a model-based approach.Psychological research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The hypothesis that reaching motions are constructed from discrete components has been explored since the earliest scientific investigations of human movement, although composition specifics have been contentious. We reinspect this process by analyzing the underlying motor intent (rather than actual motion) using our recently-developed intent determination technique. First, synthetic data analysis was used to determine our accuracy in detecting submotion events. Next, we evaluated this on healthy reaching movements and overcame the problem of indistinguishably blended submotions by exposing subjects to strong, abruptly changing forces, which lead to clear corrections identifiable using direction-based clustering. We were able to accurately recover submotion parameters and identify patterns in submotion count, peak kinetic energy, and peak-to-peak duration. These values were all exponentially distributed, which implies that selection of submotions may follow simple rules. This provides a novel opportunity to investigate human motor action using the tools of statistics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.