Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28269325›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2016

Somatosensory encoding with cuneate nucleus microstimulation: Detection of artificial stimuli.

Srihari Y Sritharan, Andrew G Richardson, Pauline K Weigand, Ivette Planell-Mendez, Xilin Liu, Hongjie Zhu, Milin Zhang, Jan Van der Spiegel, Timothy H Lucas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Applications and Future Translation of Somatosensory Neuroprostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  2. Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Srihari Y Sritharan
Andrew G Richardson
Pauline K Weigand
Ivette Planell-Mendez
Xilin Liu
Hongjie Zhu
Milin Zhang
Jan Van der Spiegel
Timothy H Lucas
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Transitioning Early Career Neurosurgeons to Scientific IndependenceK12NS080223 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ESKANDAR, EMAD N · 2012 to 2022
$9.2M
NINDS NIH HHS K12 NS080223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sense of touch and proprioception are critical to movement control. After spinal cord injury, these senses may be restored with direct, electrical microstimulation of the brain as part of a complete sensorimotor neuroprosthesis. The present study was designed to test, in part, the hypothesis that the cuneate nucleus (CN) of the brainstem is a suitable site to encode somatosensory information. Two rhesus macaques were implanted with microelectrode arrays providing chronic access to the CN. The monkeys were trained on an active touch oddity task to detect vibrotactile stimuli. When the vibrotactile stimuli were replaced with electrical stimuli delivered to the CN, initial detection probabilities were near chance. Detection performance improved over time, reaching a plateau after about 10 daily sessions. At plateau performance, the monkeys exhibited detection probabilities that were 68-80% higher than the chance probability. Finally, detection probability was quantified as a function of stimulus amplitude. The resulting psychometric curve showed a detection threshold of 45 μA for 100-Hz stimulus trains. These behavioral data are the first to show that artificial CN activation is sufficient for perception. The results are consistent with our hypothesis and motivate future tests of the CN as a somatosensory encoding site.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric StimulationMacaca mulattaMaleMedulla OblongataMicroelectrodesProbabilityProprioceptionSomatosensory CortexTouch

Identifiers

PMID28269325
PMCPMC6883769
OpenAlexW2537434391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.