Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28269041›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2016

Multi-omic approaches for characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Habtom W Ressom, Cristina Di Poto, Alessia Ferrarini, Yunli Hu, Mohammad R Nezami Ranjbar, Ehwang Song, Rency S Varghese, Minkun Wang, Shiyue Zhou, Rui Zhu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Habtom W Ressom
Cristina Di Poto
Alessia Ferrarini
Yunli Hu
Mohammad R Nezami Ranjbar
Ehwang Song
Rency S Varghese
Minkun Wang
Shiyue Zhou
Rui Zhu
Yiming Zuo
Mahlet G Tadesse
Yehia Mechref

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Louis M Weiner · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Analysis of LC-MS data to identify peptide and glycan biomarkers for hepatocellulR01CA143420 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RESSOM, HABTOM W · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
Quantitative analysis of LC-MS data for peptide and glycan biomarker discoveryR01GM086746 · NIGMS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI RESSOM, HABTOM W · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143420NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-omic approaches offer the opportunity to characterize complex diseases such as cancer at various molecular levels. In this paper, we present transcriptomic, proteomic/glycoproteomic, glycomic, and metabolomic (TPGM) data we acquired by analysis of liver tissues from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases and patients with liver cirrhosis. We evaluated changes in the levels of transcripts, proteins, glycans, and metabolites between tumor and cirrhotic tissues by statistical methods. We demonstrated the potential of multi-omic approaches and network analysis to investigate the interactions among these biomolecules in the progression of liver cirrhosis to HCC. Also, we showed the significance of multi-omic approaches to identify pathways altered in HCC.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, HepatocellularCase-Control StudiesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsMaleMetabolomicsMiddle AgedProteomics

Identifiers

PMID28269041
PMCPMC5913746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.