Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28268935›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2016

Deep neural network architectures for forecasting analgesic response.

Paul Nickerson, Patrick Tighe, Benjamin Shickel, Parisa Rashidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Using artificial intelligence to improve pain assessment and pain management: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictive Modeling of the Total Joint Replacement Surgery Risk: a Deep Learning Based Approach with Claims Data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul Nickerson
Patrick Tighe
Benjamin Shickel
Parisa Rashidi

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTIAAN LEEUWENBURGH · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
Integrating data, algorithms and clinical reasoning for surgical risk assessmentR01GM110240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, RASHIDI, PARISA · 2016 to 2025
$5.1M
Finding Good TEMporal PostOperative pain Signatures (TEMPOS)R01GM114290 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI TIGHE, PATRICK J · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Use of Machine Learning Classifiers to Forecast Severe Acute Postoperative Pain FK23GM102697 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI TIGHE, PATRICK J · 2012 to 2015
$573k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM102697NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110240NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response to prescribed analgesic drugs varies between individuals, and choosing the right drug/dose often involves a lengthy, iterative process of trial and error. Furthermore, a significant portion of patients experience adverse events such as post-operative urinary retention (POUR) during inpatient management of acute postoperative pain. To better forecast analgesic responses, we compared conventional machine learning methods with modern neural network architectures to gauge their effectiveness at forecasting temporal patterns of postoperative pain and analgesic use, as well as predicting the risk of POUR. Our results indicate that simpler machine learning approaches might offer superior results; however, all of these techniques may play a promising role for developing smarter post-operative pain management strategies.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaNeural Networks, ComputerAdministration, OralAnalgesicsHumansMachine LearningOxycodonePain MeasurementPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainSupport Vector MachineUrinary RetentionAnalgesicsOxycodone

Identifiers

PMID28268935
PMCPMC5445646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.