Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28267793›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The DRF motif of CXCR6 as chemokine receptor adaptation to adhesion.

Andrea Koenen, Aaron Babendreyer, Julian Schumacher, Tobias Pasqualon, Nicole Schwarz, Anke Seifert, Xavier Deupi, Andreas Ludwig, Daniela Dreymueller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CXCR6 by increasing retention of memory CD8Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea KoenenInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Aaron BabendreyerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Julian SchumacherInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Tobias PasqualonInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Nicole SchwarzInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Anke SeifertInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Xavier DeupiLaboratory of Biomolecular Research and Condensed Matter Theory Group, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Andreas LudwigInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Daniela DreymuellerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9702-8581
RWTH Aachen University · DEPaul Scherrer Institute · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CXC-chemokine receptor 6 (CXCR6) is a class A GTP-binding protein-coupled receptor (GPCRs) that mediates adhesion of leukocytes by interacting with the transmembrane cell surface-expressed chemokine ligand 16 (CXCL16), and also regulates leukocyte migration by interacting with the soluble shed variant of CXCL16. In contrast to virtually all other chemokine receptors with chemotactic activity, CXCR6 carries a DRF motif instead of the typical DRY motif as a key element in receptor activation and G protein coupling. In this work, modeling analyses revealed that the phenylalanine F3.51 in CXCR6 might have impact on intramolecular interactions including hydrogen bonds by this possibly changing receptor function. Initial investigations with embryonic kidney HEK293 cells and further studies with monocytic THP-1 cells showed that mutation of DRF into DRY does not influence ligand binding, receptor internalization, receptor recycling, and protein kinase B (AKT) signaling. Adhesion was slightly decreased in a time-dependent manner. However, CXCL16-induced calcium signaling and migration were increased. Vice versa, when the DRY motif of the related receptor CX3CR1 was mutated into DRF the migratory response towards CX3CL1 was diminished, indicating that the presence of a DRF motif generally impairs chemotaxis in chemokine receptors. Transmembrane and soluble CXCL16 play divergent roles in homeostasis, inflammation, and cancer, which can be beneficial or detrimental. Therefore, the DRF motif of CXCR6 may display a receptor adaptation allowing adhesion and cell retention by transmembrane CXCL16 but reducing the chemotactic response to soluble CXCL16. This adaptation may avoid permanent or uncontrolled recruitment of inflammatory cells as well as cancer metastasis.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalAmino Acid MotifsCell AdhesionAmino Acid SequenceCalcium SignalingCell LineCell MembraneCell MovementChemotaxisGene ExpressionHumansLigandsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein TransportCXCR6 protein, humanLigandsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktReceptors, ChemokineReceptors, CXCR6Receptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID28267793
PMCPMC5340378
OpenAlexW2592767437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.