Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28267788›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2017

Dementia incidence trend over 1992-2014 in the Netherlands: Analysis of primary care data.

Emma F van Bussel, Edo Richard, Derk L Arts, Astrid C J Nooyens, Preciosa M Coloma, Margot W M de Waal, Marjan van den Akker, Marion C J Biermans, Markus M J Nielen, Kees van Boven and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Trends in Memory Function and Memory Impairment Among Older Adults in the United States and Europe, 1996-2018.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Emma F van BusselDepartment of General Practice, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Edo RichardDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Derk L ArtsDepartment of General Practice, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5702-5856
Astrid C J NooyensCentre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1412-3338
Preciosa M ColomaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Margot W M de WaalDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marjan van den AkkerCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marion C J BiermansDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5401-3817
Markus M J NielenDepartment of General Practice, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kees van BovenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hugo SmeetsJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9718-1180
Fiona E MatthewsInstitute for Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-2388
Carol BrayneInstitute of Public Health, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5307-663X
Wim B BusschersDepartment of General Practice, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Willem A van GoolDepartment of Neurology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric P Moll van CharanteDepartment of General Practice, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1489-5218
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLNewcastle University · GBUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent reports have suggested declining age-specific incidence rates of dementia in high-income countries over time. Improved education and cardiovascular health in early age have been suggested to be bringing about this effect. The aim of this study was to estimate the age-specific dementia incidence trend in primary care records from a large population in the Netherlands. METHODS AND

findingsA dynamic cohort representative of the Dutch population was composed using primary care records from general practice registration networks (GPRNs) across the country. Data regarding dementia incidence were obtained using general-practitioner-recorded diagnosis of dementia within the electronic health records. Age-specific dementia incidence rates were calculated for all persons aged 60 y and over; negative binomial regression analysis was used to estimate the time trend. Nine out of eleven GPRNs provided data on more than 800,000 older people for the years 1992 to 2014, corresponding to over 4 million person-years and 23,186 incident dementia cases. The annual growth in dementia incidence rate was estimated to be 2.1% (95% CI 0.5% to 3.8%), and incidence rates were 1.08 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.13) times higher for women compared to men. Despite their relatively low numbers of person-years, the highest age groups contributed most to the increasing trend. There was no significant overall change in incidence rates since the start of a national dementia program in 2003 (-0.025; 95% CI -0.062 to 0.011). Increased awareness of dementia by patients and doctors in more recent years may have influenced dementia diagnosis by general practitioners in electronic health records, and needs to be taken into account when interpreting the data.

conclusionsWithin the clinical records of a large, representative sample of the Dutch population, we found no evidence for a declining incidence trend of dementia in the Netherlands. This could indicate true stability in incidence rates, or a balance between increased detection and a true reduction. Irrespective of the exact rates and mechanisms underlying these findings, they illustrate that the burden of work for physicians and nurses in general practice associated with newly diagnosed dementia has not been subject to substantial change in the past two decades. Hence, with the ageing of Western societies, we still need to anticipate a dramatic absolute increase in dementia occurrence over the years to come.

Indexed as

Independent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsDementiaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID28267788
PMCPMC5340347
OpenAlexW2594026696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.