ArticlePloS one
The perceptual saliency of fearful eyes and smiles: A signal detection study.
Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-of-acquisition affects object recognition and compound word identification: Evidence from visual duration thresholds and progressive demasking.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- A competitive edge: how social cues and spatial congruence influence joint attention in addressed or witnessed interactions.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- At First Sight: Fetal Eye Movements Reveal a Preference for Face-Like Configurations From 26 Weeks of Gestation.Developmental science · 2025Article
- Assessing the distortions introduced when calculating d': A simulation approach.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- How to elicit a negative bias? Manipulating contrast and saturation with the facial emotion salience task.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Drift-diffusion modeling reveals that masked faces are preconceived as unfriendly.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Anxiety as a differentiating variable in emotional recognition in juvenile offenders with high callous-unemotional traits.Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH · 2023Article
- Self-face and emotional faces-are they alike?Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021Article
- A Review of Possible EEG Markers of Abstraction, Attentiveness, and Memorisation in Cyber-Physical Systems for Special Education.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Review
- Two words as one: A multi-naming investigation of the age-of-acquisition effect in compound-word processing.Memory & cognition · 2020Article
- Correction: The perceptual saliency of fearful eyes and smiles: A signal detection study.PloS one · 2017Article
- Evidence for Anger Saliency during the Recognition of Chimeric Facial Expressions of Emotions in Underage Ebola Survivors.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial features differ in the amount of expressive information they convey. Specifically, eyes are argued to be essential for fear recognition, while smiles are crucial for recognising happy expressions. In three experiments, we tested whether expression modulates the perceptual saliency of diagnostic facial features and whether the feature's saliency depends on the face configuration. Participants were presented with masked facial features or noise at perceptual conscious threshold. The task was to indicate whether eyes (experiments 1-3A) or a mouth (experiment 3B) was present. The expression of the face and its configuration (i.e. spatial arrangement of the features) were manipulated. Experiment 1 compared fearful with neutral expressions, experiments 2 and 3 compared fearful versus happy expressions. The detection accuracy data was analysed using Signal Detection Theory (SDT), to examine the effects of expression and configuration on perceptual precision (d') and response bias (c), separately. Across all three experiments, fearful eyes were detected better (higher d') than neutral and happy eyes. Eyes were more precisely detected than mouths, whereas smiles were detected better than fearful mouths. The configuration of the features had no consistent effects across the experiments on the ability to detect expressive features. But facial configuration affected consistently the response bias. Participants used a more liberal criterion for detecting the eyes in canonical configuration and fearful expression. Finally, the power in low spatial frequency of a feature predicted its discriminability index. The results suggest that expressive features are perceptually more salient with a higher d' due to changes at the low-level visual properties, with emotions and configuration affecting perception through top-down processes, as reflected by the response bias.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.