Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28267590›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2017

Unsupervised ensemble ranking of terms in electronic health record notes based on their importance to patients.

Jinying Chen, Hong Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. MedJEx: A Medical Jargon Extraction Model with Wiki's Hyperlink Span and Contextualized Masked Language Model Score.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Natural Language Processing for EHR-Based Computational Phenotyping.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinying ChenDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States. Electronic address: jinying.chen@umassmed.edu.
Hong YuBedford Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford, MA, United States; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.

Funding

Transdisciplinary Training In Cardiovascular ResearchT32HL120823 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI DONAHUE, J KEVIN, KIEFE, CATARINA I. · 2014 to 2025
$3.9M
Resource Curation and Evaluation for EHR Note ComprehensionR01LM012817 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI YU, HONG · 2018 to 2020
$1.0M
Systems for Helping Veterans Comprehend Electronic Health Record NotesI01HX001457 · VA · NORTHAMPTON VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI YU, HONG · 2015 to 2020
–
HSRD VA I01 HX001457NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL120823NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllowing patients to access their own electronic health record (EHR) notes through online patient portals has the potential to improve patient-centered care. However, EHR notes contain abundant medical jargon that can be difficult for patients to comprehend. One way to help patients is to reduce information overload and help them focus on medical terms that matter most to them. Targeted education can then be developed to improve patient EHR comprehension and the quality of care.

objectiveThe aim of this work was to develop FIT (Finding Important Terms for patients), an unsupervised natural language processing (NLP) system that ranks medical terms in EHR notes based on their importance to patients.

methodsWe built FIT on a new unsupervised ensemble ranking model derived from the biased random walk algorithm to combine heterogeneous information resources for ranking candidate terms from each EHR note. Specifically, FIT integrates four single views (rankers) for term importance: patient use of medical concepts, document-level term salience, word co-occurrence based term relatedness, and topic coherence. It also incorporates partial information of term importance as conveyed by terms' unfamiliarity levels and semantic types. We evaluated FIT on 90 expert-annotated EHR notes and used the four single-view rankers as baselines. In addition, we implemented three benchmark unsupervised ensemble ranking methods as strong baselines.

resultsFIT achieved 0.885 AUC-ROC for ranking candidate terms from EHR notes to identify important terms. When including term identification, the performance of FIT for identifying important terms from EHR notes was 0.813 AUC-ROC. Both performance scores significantly exceeded the corresponding scores from the four single rankers (P<0.001). FIT also outperformed the three ensemble rankers for most metrics. Its performance is relatively insensitive to its parameter.

conclusionsFIT can automatically identify EHR terms important to patients. It may help develop future interventions to improve quality of care. By using unsupervised learning as well as a robust and flexible framework for information fusion, FIT can be readily applied to other domains and applications.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsHealth Records, PersonalNatural Language ProcessingComprehensionHumansTerminology as TopicElectronic health recordInformation extractionNatural language processingUnsupervised ensemble ranking

Identifiers

PMID28267590
PMCPMC5505865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.