ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2017
Automating cell detection and classification in human brain fluorescent microscopy images using dictionary learning and sparse coding.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthetic Scientific Image Generation with VAE, GAN, and Diffusion Model Architectures.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Scale selection and machine learning based cell segmentation and tracking in time lapse microscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Interpretable Classification of Tauopathies with a Convolutional Neural Network Pipeline Using Transfer Learning and Validation against Post-Mortem Clinical Cases of Alzheimer's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Article
- GANscan: continuous scanning microscopy using deep learning deblurring.Light, science & applications · 2022Article
- Effect of sex and autism spectrum disorder on oxytocin receptor binding and mRNA expression in the dopaminergic pars compacta of the human substantia nigra.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Deep learning for Alzheimer's disease: Mapping large-scale histological tau protein for neuroimaging biomarker validation.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- A Systematic, Open-Science Framework for Quantification of Cell-Types in Mouse Brain Sections Using Fluorescence Microscopy.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2021Article
- dotdotdot: an automated approach to quantify multiplex single molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization (smFISH) images in complex tissues.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- A manual multiplex immunofluorescence method for investigating neurodegenerative diseases.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2020Article
- Mapping mesoscale axonal projections in the mouse brain using a 3D convolutional network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- High-throughput fluorescence microscopy using multi-frame motion deblurring.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Relation of koniocellular layers of dorsal lateral geniculate to inferior pulvinar nuclei in common marmosets.The European journal of neuroscience · 2019Article
- A novel generic dictionary-based denoising method for improving noisy and densely packed nuclei segmentation in 3D time-lapse fluorescence microscopy images.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in harmonization of high-resolution post-mortem MRI (virtopsy) with respect to brain microstructure.Brain informatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmunofluorescence (IF) plays a major role in quantifying protein expression in situ and understanding cell function. It is widely applied in assessing disease mechanisms and in drug discovery research. Automation of IF analysis can transform studies using experimental cell models. However, IF analysis of postmortem human tissue relies mostly on manual interaction, often subjected to low-throughput and prone to error, leading to low inter and intra-observer reproducibility. Human postmortem brain samples challenges neuroscientists because of the high level of autofluorescence caused by accumulation of lipofuscin pigment during aging, hindering systematic analyses. We propose a method for automating cell counting and classification in IF microscopy of human postmortem brains. Our algorithm speeds up the quantification task while improving reproducibility. NEW
methodDictionary learning and sparse coding allow for constructing improved cell representations using IF images. These models are input for detection and segmentation methods. Classification occurs by means of color distances between cells and a learned set.
resultsOur method successfully detected and classified cells in 49 human brain images. We evaluated our results regarding true positive, false positive, false negative, precision, recall, false positive rate and F1 score metrics. We also measured user-experience and time saved compared to manual countings. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
methodsWe compared our results to four open-access IF-based cell-counting tools available in the literature. Our method showed improved accuracy for all data samples.
conclusionThe proposed method satisfactorily detects and classifies cells from human postmortem brain IF images, with potential to be generalized for applications in other counting tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.