Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28267565›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2017

Automating cell detection and classification in human brain fluorescent microscopy images using dictionary learning and sparse coding.

Maryana Alegro, Panagiotis Theofilas, Austin Nguy, Patricia A Castruita, William Seeley, Helmut Heinsen, Daniela M Ushizima, Lea T Grinberg

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mapping mesoscale axonal projections in the mouse brain using a 3D convolutional network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maryana AlegroMemory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: maryana.alegro@ucsf.edu.
Panagiotis TheofilasMemory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: panos.theofilas@ucsf.edu.
Austin NguyMemory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: austin.nguy@ucsf.edu.
Patricia A CastruitaMemory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: alejandra.castcap@gmail.com.
William SeeleyMemory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: bill.seeley@ucsf.edu.
Helmut HeinsenMedical School of the University of São Paulo, Av. Reboucas 381, São Paulo, SP 05401-000, Brazil. Electronic address: heinsen@mail.uni-wuerzburg.de.
Daniela M UshizimaComputational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Berkeley Institute for Data Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Electronic address: dushizima@lbl.gov.
Lea T GrinbergMemory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: lea.grinberg@ucsf.edu.
University Memory and Aging Center · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

TDP-43 Loss-of-Function: Biology to BiomarkersP01AG019724 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jennifer Merrilees · 2002 to 2026
$67.2M
PrPSc SPECIFIC INTERACTION WITH NOVEL PrP-Fc FUSION PROTEINSP50AG023501 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MILLER, BRUCE L · 2004 to 2018
$27.1M
SF BUILD: Enabling Students to Represent in ScienceTL4GM118986 · NIGMS · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MARQUEZ-MAGANA, LETICIA MARIA, MORRIS, MEGHAN D · 2015 to 2022
$5.4M
Brainstem as an early site in AD and FTLD: closing the etiopathogenic gapR01AG040311 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRINBERG, LEA TENENHOLZ · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
Neuropathological changes underlying clinical heterogeneity in Alzheimer diseaseK24AG053435 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRINBERG, LEA TENENHOLZ · 2016 to 2025
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG053435NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019724NIA NIH HHS P50 AG023501NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040311NIGMS NIH HHS TL4 GM118986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunofluorescence (IF) plays a major role in quantifying protein expression in situ and understanding cell function. It is widely applied in assessing disease mechanisms and in drug discovery research. Automation of IF analysis can transform studies using experimental cell models. However, IF analysis of postmortem human tissue relies mostly on manual interaction, often subjected to low-throughput and prone to error, leading to low inter and intra-observer reproducibility. Human postmortem brain samples challenges neuroscientists because of the high level of autofluorescence caused by accumulation of lipofuscin pigment during aging, hindering systematic analyses. We propose a method for automating cell counting and classification in IF microscopy of human postmortem brains. Our algorithm speeds up the quantification task while improving reproducibility. NEW

methodDictionary learning and sparse coding allow for constructing improved cell representations using IF images. These models are input for detection and segmentation methods. Classification occurs by means of color distances between cells and a learned set.

resultsOur method successfully detected and classified cells in 49 human brain images. We evaluated our results regarding true positive, false positive, false negative, precision, recall, false positive rate and F1 score metrics. We also measured user-experience and time saved compared to manual countings. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsWe compared our results to four open-access IF-based cell-counting tools available in the literature. Our method showed improved accuracy for all data samples.

conclusionThe proposed method satisfactorily detects and classifies cells from human postmortem brain IF images, with potential to be generalized for applications in other counting tasks.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlzheimer DiseaseBrainCell CountFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, FluorescencePattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsDictionary learningImage segmentationImmunofluorescenceMicroscopyPostmortem human brainSparse models

Identifiers

PMID28267565
PMCPMC5600818
OpenAlexW2594610976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.