ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2017
Multi-functional scaling methodology for translational pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic applications using integrated microphysiological systems (MPS).
Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- PK-Informed Microphysiological Systems: From Dynamic Dosing to Quantitative In Vitro-In Vivo Translation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- From dietary exposure to systemic toxicity: organ-on-chip and multi-organ microphysiological systems for green food toxicology.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- A primary human Gut/Liver microphysiological system to estimate human oral bioavailability.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2025Article
- Article
- Liver-on-chips for drug discovery and development.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Bridging systems biology and tissue engineering: Unleashing the full potential of complex 3DBiophysics reviews · 2024Review
- Microphysiological systems as reliable drug discovery and evaluation tools: Evolution from innovation to maturity.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Review
- Predictive Design and Analysis of Drug Transport by Multiscale Computational Models Under Uncertainty.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Review
- Studying metabolism with multi-organ chips: new tools for disease modelling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.Open biology · 2022Review
- Implementing organ-on-chip in a next-generation risk assessment of chemicals: a review.Archives of toxicology · 2022Review
- Engineering Modular 3D Liver Culture MicroenvironmentsAdvanced nanobiomed research · 2022Article
- Patient-Specific Organoid and Organ-on-a-Chip: 3D Cell-Culture Meets 3D Printing and Numerical Simulation.Advanced biology · 2021Review
- The Combination of Cell Cultured Technology and In Silico Model to Inform the Drug Development.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Characterizing the reproducibility in using a liver microphysiological system for assaying drug toxicity, metabolism, and accumulation.Clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Kidney Organoid and Microphysiological Kidney Chip Models to Accelerate Drug Development and Reduce Animal Testing.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Three-Dimensional Regeneration of Patient-Derived Intestinal Organoid Epithelium in a Physiodynamic Mucosal Interface-on-a-Chip.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Organ-on-a-chip engineering: Toward bridging the gap between lab and industry.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Review
- An Improved Vascularized, Dual-Channel Microphysiological System Facilitates Modeling of Proximal Tubular Solute Secretion.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2020Article
- Quantitative prediction of human pharmacokinetic responses to drugs via fluidically coupled vascularized organ chips.Nature biomedical engineering · 2020Article
- A Microfluidic Perfusion Platform for In Vitro Analysis of Drug Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Relationships.The AAPS journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microphysiological systems (MPS) provide relevant physiological environments in vitro for studies of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and biological mechanisms for translational research. Designing multi-MPS platforms is essential to study multi-organ systems. Typical design approaches, including direct and allometric scaling, scale each MPS individually and are based on relative sizes not function. This study's aim was to develop a new multi-functional scaling approach for integrated multi-MPS platform design for specific applications. We developed an optimization approach using mechanistic modeling and specification of an objective that considered multiple MPS functions, e.g., drug absorption and metabolism, simultaneously to identify system design parameters. This approach informed the design of two hypothetical multi-MPS platforms consisting of gut and liver (multi-MPS platform I) and gut, liver and kidney (multi-MPS platform II) to recapitulate in vivo drug exposures in vitro. This allows establishment of clinically relevant drug exposure-response relationships, a prerequisite for efficacy and toxicology assessment. Design parameters resulting from multi-functional scaling were compared to designs based on direct and allometric scaling. Human plasma time-concentration profiles of eight drugs were used to inform the designs, and profiles of an additional five drugs were calculated to test the designed platforms on an independent set. Multi-functional scaling yielded exposure times in good agreement with in vivo data, while direct and allometric scaling approaches resulted in short exposure durations. Multi-functional scaling allows appropriate scaling from in vivo to in vitro of multi-MPS platforms, and in the cases studied provides designs that better mimic in vivo exposures than standard MPS scaling methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.