Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28267057›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2017

Female pelvic floor biomechanics: bridging the gap.

Deanna C Easley, Steven D Abramowitch, Pamela A Moalli

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Biomechanical integrity score of the female pelvic floor.International urogynecology journal · 2022
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Predictive Value of Biomechanical Mapping for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deanna C EasleyaDepartment of Bioengineering bDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Steven D Abramowitch
Pamela A Moalli
University of Pittsburgh · USInstitute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery · US

Funding

Porosity and tensioning: Critical factors to consider when choosing a prolapse meshR01HD083383 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ABRAMOWITCH, STEVEN D, MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2016 to 2025
$5.5M
Comprehensive Evaluation of Prolapse Meshes by an Interdisciplinary Research TeamR01HD061811 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
IMPACT OF MENOPAUSE ON VAGINAL CONNECTIVE TISSUE SUPPORTR01HD045590 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD045590NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061811NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe pelvic floor is a complex assembly of connective tissues and striated muscles that simultaneously counteracts gravitational forces, inertial forces, and intra-abdominal pressures while maintaining the position of the pelvic organs. In 30% of women, injury or failure of the pelvic floor results in pelvic organ prolapse. Surgical treatments have high recurrence rates, due, in part, to a limited understanding of physiologic loading conditions. It is critical to apply biomechanics to help elucidate how altered loading conditions of the pelvis contribute to the development of pelvic organ prolapse and to define surgeries to restore normal support. RECENT

findingsEvidence suggests the ewe is a potential animal model for studying vaginal properties and that uterosacral and cardinal ligaments experience significant creep, which may be affecting surgical outcomes. A new method of measuring ligament displacements in vivo was developed, and finite element models that simulate urethral support, pelvic floor dynamics, and the impact of episiotomies on the pelvic floor were studied. SUMMARY: The current review highlights some contributions over the past year, including mechanical testing and the creation of models, which are used to understand pelvic floor changes with loading and the impact of surgical procedures, to illustrate how biomechanics is being utilized.

Indexed as

UrethraVaginaAnimalsFemaleHumansLigamentsMalePelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapseSheep

Identifiers

PMID28267057
PMCPMC5639926
OpenAlexW2593409019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.