Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28266616›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Genetic signatures of natural selection in a model invasive ascidian.

Yaping Lin, Yiyong Chen, Changho Yi, Jonathan J Fong, Won Kim, Marc Rius, Aibin Zhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genomic investigations of successful invasions: the picture emerging from recent studies.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Conserved Signaling Pathways in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The reconstruction of invasion histories with genomic data in light of differing levels of anthropogenic transport.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Methylation divergence of invasiveEcology and evolution · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yaping LinResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 18 Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, China.
Yiyong ChenResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 18 Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, China.
Changho YiMarine Biodiversity Assessment and Management Team, National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, 101-75 Jangsan-ro, Janghang-eup, Seocheon-gun Chungcheongnam-do 33662, Korea.
Jonathan J FongScience Unit, Lingnan University, 8 Castle Peak Road, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.
Won KimSchool of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Marc RiusOcean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom.
Aibin ZhanResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 18 Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive species represent promising models to study species' responses to rapidly changing environments. Although local adaptation frequently occurs during contemporary range expansion, the associated genetic signatures at both population and genomic levels remain largely unknown. Here, we use genome-wide gene-associated microsatellites to investigate genetic signatures of natural selection in a model invasive ascidian, Ciona robusta. Population genetic analyses of 150 individuals sampled in Korea, New Zealand, South Africa and Spain showed significant genetic differentiation among populations. Based on outlier tests, we found high incidence of signatures of directional selection at 19 loci. Hitchhiking mapping analyses identified 12 directional selective sweep regions, and all selective sweep windows on chromosomes were narrow (~8.9 kb). Further analyses indentified 132 candidate genes under selection. When we compared our genetic data and six crucial environmental variables, 16 putatively selected loci showed significant correlation with these environmental variables. This suggests that the local environmental conditions have left significant signatures of selection at both population and genomic levels. Finally, we identified "plastic" genomic regions and genes that are promising regions to investigate evolutionary responses to rapid environmental change in C. robusta.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationIntroduced SpeciesMicrosatellite RepeatsNew ZealandRepublic of KoreaSouth AfricaSpainUrochordata

Identifiers

PMID28266616
PMCPMC5339779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.