Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28266567›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Global and regional changes in exposure to extreme heat and the relative contributions of climate and population change.

Zhao Liu, Bruce Anderson, Kai Yan, Weihua Dong, Hua Liao, Peijun Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Built environment for physical activity-An urban barometer, surveillance, and monitoring.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2020
    Review
  19. Projecting Drivers of Human Vulnerability under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhao LiuState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Bruce AndersonDepartment of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, 02115, USA.
Kai YanSchool of Geography, State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Weihua DongSchool of Geography, State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Hua LiaoSchool of Geography, State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Peijun ShiState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frequency and intensity of extreme heat wave events have increased in the past several decades and are likely to continue to increase in the future under the influence of human-induced climate change. Exposure refers to people, property, systems, or other elements present in hazard zones that are thereby subject to potential losses. Exposure to extreme heat and changes therein are not just determined by climate changes but also population changes. Here we analyze output for three scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and socio-economic growth to estimate future exposure change taking account of both climate and population factors. We find that for the higher emission scenario (RCP8.5-SSP3), the global exposure increases nearly 30-fold by 2100. The average exposure for Africa is over 118 times greater than it has been historically, while the exposure for Europe increases by only a factor of four. Importantly, in the absence of climate change, exposure is reduced by 75-95% globally and across all geographic regions, as compared with exposure under the high emission scenario. Under lower emission scenarios RCP4.5-SSP2 and RCP2.6-SSP1, the global exposure is reduced by 65% and 85% respectively, highlighting the efficacy of mitigation efforts in reducing exposure to extreme heat.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemEnvironmental ExposureExtreme HeatPopulation DynamicsAfricaComputer SimulationEuropeHumans

Identifiers

PMID28266567
PMCPMC5339717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.