ArticleScientific reports2017
Ecological interactions among Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: insight into the dominance phenomenon.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of compartmentalization systems to study microbial interactions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Protein Biosynthesis and Carbon Catabolite Repression Are Transcriptionally Upregulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Extracellular Fractions From Several Wine Yeast Species.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Exosomal Biomarkers: A Comprehensive Overview of Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications in Malignant and Non-Malignant Disorders.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Occurrence and Persistence ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Article
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds similarly to co-culture or to a fraction enriched in Metschnikowia pulcherrima extracellular vesicles.Microbial biotechnology · 2023Article
- A Transcriptomic Analysis of Higher-Order Ecological Interactions in a Eukaryotic Model Microbial Ecosystem.mSphere · 2022Article
- Truth in wine yeast.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Review
- Convergent adaptation of Saccharomyces uvarum to sulfite, an antimicrobial preservative widely used in human-driven fermentations.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Understanding Wine through Yeast Interactions.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Mechanisms Involved in Interspecific Communication between Wine Yeasts.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Extracellular vesicles in food biotechnology.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Article
- Proteomic characterization of extracellular vesicles produced by several wine yeast species.Microbial biotechnology · 2020Article
- Yeast-Yeast Interactions: Mechanisms, Methodologies and Impact on Composition.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- Ecological interactions are a primary driver of population dynamics in wine yeast microbiota during fermentation.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Review
- Using Large Datasets to Understand Nanotechnology.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2019Review
- Quantifying the Effects of Ethanol and Temperature on the Fitness Advantage of PredominantFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- The Impact ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Different Non-Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the behaviour of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, in order to obtain insight into the intraspecies competition taking place in mixed populations of this species. Two strains of S. cerevisiae, one dominant and one non-dominant, were labelled and mixed, and individual fermentations were set up to study the transcriptomes of the strains by means of RNA-seq. The results obtained suggest that cell-to-cell contact and aggregation, which are driven by the expression of genes that are associated with the cell surface, are indispensable conditions for the achievement of dominance. Observations on mixed aggregates, made up of cells of both strains, which were detected by means of flow cytometry, have confirmed the transcriptomic data. Furthermore, overexpression of the SSU1 gene, which encodes for a transporter that confers resistance to sulphites, provides an ecological advantage to the dominant strain. A mechanistic model is proposed that sheds light on the dominance phenomenon between different strains of the S. cerevisiae species. The collected data suggest that cell-to-cell contact, together with differential sulphite production and resistance is important in determining the dominance of one strain over another.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.