ArticleNature reviews. Clinical oncology2017
Drugs that lack single-agent activity: are they worth pursuing in combination?
Article in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cardiovascular/anti-inflammatory drugs repurposed for treating or preventing cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of the contribution of randomised cancer clinical trials evaluating agents without documented single-agent activity.ESMO open · 2020Trial
- Article
- Assessing patient risk, benefit and outcomes in drug development: an observational study of regorafenib clinical trials.BMJ oncology · 2024Article
- Independent Drug Action in Combination Therapy: Implications for Precision Oncology.Cancer discovery · 2022Review
- Can Any Drug Be Repurposed for Cancer Treatment? A Systematic Assessment of the Scientific Literature.Cancers · 2021Article
- Pharmacology-based ranking of anti-cancer drugs to guide clinical development of cancer immunotherapy combinations.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021Review
- Combining epigenetic drugs with other therapies for solid tumours - past lessons and future promise.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2020Review
- Low-value approvals and high prices might incentivize ineffective drug development.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2018Article
- Management of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: novel agents, antibodies, immunotherapies and beyond.Leukemia · 2018Review
- Implementing targeted therapies in the treatment of glioblastoma: Previous shortcomings, future promises, and a multimodal strategy recommendation.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28266519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.