Trial reportDeutsches Arzteblatt international2017
Screening for Bowel Cancer: Increasing Participation via Personal Invitation.
Trial report in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Increasing Influenza Vaccination Rates in People With Chronic Illness.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Pooled it
- The Effects of Differing Invitation Models on the Uptake of Immunological Fecal Occult Blood Testing.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020Trial
- Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018Trial
- Intended and Actual Participation in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024Observational
- Would initiating colorectal cancer screening from age of 45 be cost-effective in Germany? An individual-level simulation analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Availability of Financial and Medical Resources for Screening Providers and Its Impact on Cancer Screening Uptake and Intervention Programs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.Endoscopy international open · 2021Review
- Review
- Effect of Various Invitation Schemes on the Use of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- Avoidable Cancer Mortality in Germany Since Reunification: Regional Variation and Sex Differences.Frontiers in public health · 2019Article
- Individual invitation letters lead to significant increase in attendance for screening colonoscopies: Results of a pilot study in Northern Hesse, Germany.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018Article
- In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Article
- Preventing Bowel Cancer Through Hormones.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Article
- Missing Information.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Article
- Colonoscopy in Germany-Important Steps Towards a National Screening Program.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Article
- Using "Age and Total-PSA" as the Main Indicators: The Results of Taizhou Integrated Prostate Screening (No 2).American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParticipation rates in bowel cancer screening programs in Germany continue to be low. In a model project, a logistically simple procedure for inviting patients to participate was tested as a means of increasing participation.
methodsA randomized trial was performed involving persons residing in the German federal state of Saarland who had either their 50th or their 55th birthday in the year beginning on 1 April 2012 (18 560 and 16 824 persons, respectively). The 50-year-olds received a written invitation to undergo a test for blood in the stool, either with or without a stool test attached, or else no invitation at all. The 55-year-olds received either an invitation to undergo colonoscopy or no invitation. Participation rates within one year were determined from billing data of the Saarland Association of Statutory Health. Insurance Physicians. The trial was registered in the German Registry of Clinical Trials, no. DRKS00006098.
resultsA written invitation to undergo testing of the stool for blood, together with an accompanying test, increased the participation rate within one year by 62% (from 15% to 25%, p <0.001, especially among men (+158% vs. +39% for women). The participation rate was higher in general among women than among men (33% vs. 17%). On the other hand, a written invitation with no accompanying test did not increase the participation rate. A written invitation to undergo colonoscopic screening increased the participation rate within one year by 32% (5.9% vs 4.4%, p <0.001).
conclusionTargeted invitations can markedly increase participation rates in cancer screening. Written invitations to undergo stool testing for blood should be accompanied by an actual test. Further trials should also include information about the number of adenomas and carcinomas detected by screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.