Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28265867›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater2017

[Acute day hospital as a cost-effective alternative to inpatient therapy].

Kunigunde Pausch, Carlos Nordt, Eva-Maria Pichler, Ingeborg Warnke, Erich Seifritz, Wolfram Kawohl

Erratum issuedAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. ["But you know Mr. M., you won't get hospitalised" : A qualitative study on service users' experience of seeking psychiatric inpatient admission].Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2017
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kunigunde PauschKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik/Zentrum für Soziale Psychiatrie, Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich, Militärstrasse 8, 8021, Zürich, Schweiz. kunigunde.pausch@puk.zh.ch.
Carlos NordtKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik/Zentrum für Soziale Psychiatrie, Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich, Militärstrasse 8, 8021, Zürich, Schweiz.
Eva-Maria PichlerPsychiatrische Dienste Aargau (PDAG), Aargau, Schweiz.
Ingeborg WarnkeForensisch-Psychiatrischer Dienst (FPD), Institut für Rechtsmedizin, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz.
Erich SeifritzKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik/Zentrum für Soziale Psychiatrie, Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich, Militärstrasse 8, 8021, Zürich, Schweiz.
Wolfram KawohlPsychiatrische Dienste Aargau (PDAG), Aargau, Schweiz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is a study of the cost-benefit advantage of the model project acute day hospital (ATK) compared to inpatient care.

methodsThe study was performed retrospectively and examined the direct costs and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) in a matched sample.

resultsThe day clinic treatment compared to inpatient therapy showed at a cost benefit of 2.68: 1 at a slightly delayed increase in GAF-value.

conclusionThe treatment in ATK is more than twice as cheap compared to inpatient treatment, but at a slightly slower improvement in symptoms.

Indexed as

Acute day hospitalClinical outcomeComparabilityCostsPsychiatric patients

Identifiers

PMID28265867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.