Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28265818›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2018

The patients' view: impact of the extent of resection, intraoperative imaging, and awake surgery on health-related quality of life in high-grade glioma patients-results of a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Katrin Nickel, Mirjam Renovanz, Jochem König, Linda Stöckelmaier, Anne-Katrin Hickmann, Minou Nadji-Ohl, Jens Engelke, Elke Weimann, Dirk Freudenstein, Oliver Ganslandt and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. AI-AssistedClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Katrin NickelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Ulm, Günzburg, Germany.
Mirjam RenovanzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Jochem KönigInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Linda StöckelmaierDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Ulm, Günzburg, Germany.
Anne-Katrin HickmannCenter for Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Klinik Hierslanden, Zürich, Switzerland.
Minou Nadji-OhlDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Jens EngelkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Ulm, Günzburg, Germany.
Elke WeimannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Dirk FreudensteinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Oliver GanslandtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Lars BullingerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Christian Rainer WirtzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Ulm, Günzburg, Germany.
Jan CoburgerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Ulm, Günzburg, Germany. Jan.coburger@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3677-8258
Universität Ulm · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKatharinenhospital · DEKlinikum Ludwigsburg · DEKlinik Hirslanden · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to assess the influence of extent of resection (EoR), use of intraoperative imaging, and awake surgery on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in high-grade glioma (HGG) patients in a prospective multicenter study. We analyzed 170 surgeries of patients suffering from a HGG. During the first year after resection, HRQoL was evaluated using the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire C30 and Brain Neoplasm 20 questionnaires. We assessed the influence of EoR; awake surgery; and use of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), intraoperative MRI (iMRI), and their combination on sum scores for function and symptoms as well as several neurological single items. In mixed-model analyses, adjustments for age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and eloquent location were performed. In the mixed model, EoR generally did not significantly influence HRQoL (p = 0.10). Yet, patients receiving subtotal resection (STR) vs. patients with biopsy showed significantly better QoL and role and cognitive functions (p = 0.04, p = 0.02, and p < 0.01, respectively). The combination of iMRI and 5-ALA reached the highest EoR (95%) followed by iMRI alone (94%), 5-ALA alone (74%), and no imaging (73%). Thereby, neurological symptoms were lowest and functioning score highest after combined use of iMRI and 5-ALA, without reaching significance (p = 0.59). Despite lower scores in emotional function (59 vs. 46, p = 0.24), no significant impact of awake surgery on HRQoL was found (p = 0.70). In HGG patients, STR compared to biopsy was significantly associated with better HRQoL and fewer neurological symptoms in this series. An escalated use of intraoperative imaging increased EoR with stable or slightly better HRQoL and fewer neurological symptoms. Based on HRQoL, awake surgery was a well-tolerated and safe method in our series.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedAminolevulinic AcidBiopsyBrain NeoplasmsCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGliomaHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeAminolevulinic AcidPhotosensitizing Agents5-Aminolevulinic acidAwake surgeryExtent of resectionHealth-related quality of lifeHigh-grade gliomaIntraoperative magnetic resonance imagingKarnofsky performance status

Identifiers

PMID28265818
OpenAlexW2592662911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.