Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28265803›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2017

Public Awareness of and Contact With Physicians Who Receive Industry Payments: A National Survey.

Genevieve Pham-Kanter, Michelle M Mello, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, Eric G Campbell, Daniel Carpenter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Towards Patient-Centered Conflicts of Interest Policy.International journal of health policy and management · 2018
    Article
  16. Ethical Considerations of Patient-Funded Research for Multiple Sclerosis Therapeutics.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Altruism and Medical Practice.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Genevieve Pham-KanterDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Nesbitt Hall, 3215 Market Street, Room 352, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. gpkanter@drexel.edu.
Michelle M MelloStanford Law School, and Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lisa Soleymani LehmannDepartment of Medicine and Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, and Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Eric G CampbellMongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Daniel CarpenterDepartment of Government and Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Physician Payments Sunshine Act, part of the Affordable Care Act, requires pharmaceutical and medical device firms to report payments they make to physicians and, through its Open Payments program, makes this information publicly available.

objectiveTo establish estimates of the exposure of the American patient population to physicians who accept industry payments, to compare these population-based estimates to physician-based estimates of industry contact, and to investigate Americans' awareness of industry payments.

designCross-sectional survey conducted in late September and early October 2014, with data linkage of respondents' physicians to Open Payments data.

participantsA total of 3542 adults drawn from a large, nationally representative household panel. MAIN MEASURES: Respondents' contact with physicians reported in Open Payments to have received industry payments; respondents' awareness that physicians receive payments from industry and that payment information is publicly available; respondents' knowledge of whether their own physician received industry payments. KEY

resultsAmong the 1987 respondents who could be matched to a specific physician, 65% saw a physician who had received an industry payment during the previous 12 months. This population-based estimate of exposure to industry contact is much higher than physician-based estimates from the same period, which indicate that 41% of physicians received an industry payment. Across the six most frequently visited specialties, patient contact with physicians who had received an industry payment ranged from 60 to 85%; the percentage of physicians with industry contact in these specialties was much lower (35-56%). Only 12% of survey respondents knew that payment information was publicly available, and only 5% knew whether their own doctor had received payments.

conclusionsPatients' contact with physicians who receive industry payments is more prevalent than physician-based measures of industry contact would suggest. Very few Americans know whether their own doctor has received industry payments or are aware that payment information is publicly available.

Indexed as

AwarenessPhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDrug IndustryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPublic SectorYoung Adultfinancial conflicts of interestindustry paymentsopen paymentsphysician-industry relationshipsphysician payments sunshine act

Identifiers

PMID28265803
PMCPMC5481229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.