Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28265802›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2017

Translation and Adaptation of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) for Use in Denmark.

Birgitte Rode Diness, Gritt Overbeck, Tina Duelund Hjortshøj, Trine Bjørg Hammer, Susanne Timshel, Else Sørensen, Marion McAllister

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Birgitte Rode DinessDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Kennedy Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark. Birgitte.rode.diness@regionh.dk.
Gritt OverbeckThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tina Duelund HjortshøjDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Kennedy Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.
Trine Bjørg HammerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Kennedy Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.
Susanne TimshelDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Kennedy Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.
Else SørensenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Kennedy Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.
Marion McAllisterInstitute of Cancer & Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcome measurement in clinical genetics is challenging. Robust outcome measures are needed to provide evidence to support service development within genetic counseling. The Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24), a Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM), was developed in English and validated with clinical genetics patients in the British NHS. This study reports the translation and adaptation of the GCOS-24 for use in Denmark. GCOS-24 was translated and back translated, supervised by an expert committee. Feedback on the first version was collected from genetic counseling patients in qualitative interviews focusing on instructions for use, response options and specific items considered semantically difficult. After further adjustment the adapted and translated version was administered to a second sample of patients, with responses analyzed using descriptive statistics. Eighteen interviews were conducted, and led to adjustment of item wording. Sixty-one patients completed the final version GCOS-24dk. Internal consistency is good (Cronbach's α =0.79), with an acceptable number of missing responses and no floor or ceiling effect observed. GCOS-24 has been successfully translated and adapted for use in a Danish setting. The study confirms the feasibility of local adaptation of patient reported outcome measures and stresses the importance of adaptation, even across quite similar populations and health care systems.

Indexed as

DenmarkFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsEmpowermentGenetic counselingPROMTranslation and cultural adaptation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.