Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28265720›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2017

Communal Participation in Payment for Environmental Services (PES): Unpacking the Collective Decision to Enroll.

Felipe Murtinho, Tanya Hayes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felipe MurtinhoInternational Studies and Institute of Public Service, Seattle University, 901 12th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA. murtinhf@seattleu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6306-8713
Tanya HayesInstitute of Public Service and Environmental Studies, Seattle University, 901 12th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98122, USA.
Seattle University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Payment for Environmental Service programs are increasingly applied in communal settings where resource users collectively join the program and agree to limit their shared use of a common-property resource. Who decides to join PES and the degree to which community members agree with the collective decision is critical for the success of said programs. Yet, we have limited understanding of the factors that influence communal participation and the collective decision process. This paper examines communal participation in a national payment for conservation program in Ecuador. We use quantitative and qualitative analysis to (i) identify the attributes of the communities that participate (or not), and factors that facilitate participation (n = 67), and (ii) assess household preference and alignment with the collective decision to participate (n = 212). Household participation preferences indicate varying degrees of consensus with the collective decision to participate, with those using the resource less likely to support participation. At the communal level, however, our results indicate that over time, those communities that depend more heavily on their resource systems may ultimately choose to participate. Our findings suggest that communal governance structures and outside organizations may be instrumental in gaining participation in resource-dependent communities and building consensus. Findings also point to the need for further research on communal decision-processes to ensure that the collective decision is based on an informed and democratic process.

Indexed as

AltitudeChoice BehaviorCommunity ParticipationConservation of Natural ResourcesCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision MakingEcosystemEcuadorEnvironmental PolicyHumansModels, TheoreticalCollective actionCommon-pool resourceConservationEcosystem servicesLatin AmericaPáramo

Identifiers

PMID28265720
OpenAlexW2593267979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.