Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28265583›Full record

SynthesisJournal of immunology research2017

Clinical Outcomes of Specific Immunotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jiang Chen, Guo Xiao-Zhong, Xing-Shun Qi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of immunology research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiang ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenyang General Hospital of PLA, No. 83 Wenhua Road Shenyang City, Liaoning 110016, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4672-3549
Guo Xiao-ZhongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenyang General Hospital of PLA, No. 83 Wenhua Road Shenyang City, Liaoning 110016, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5836-6342
Xing-Shun QiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenyang General Hospital of PLA, No. 83 Wenhua Road Shenyang City, Liaoning 110016, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific immunotherapies, including vaccines with autologous tumor cells and tumor antigen-specific monoclonal antibodies, are important treatments for PC patients. To evaluate the clinical outcomes of PC-specific immunotherapy, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the relevant published clinical trials. The effects of specific immunotherapy were compared with those of nonspecific immunotherapy and the meta-analysis was executed with results regarding the overall survival (OS), immune responses data, and serum cancer markers data. The pooled analysis was performed by using the random-effects model. We found that significantly improved OS was noted for PC patients utilizing specific immunotherapy and an improved immune response was also observed. In conclusion, specific immunotherapy was superior in prolonging the survival time and enhancing immunological responses in PC patients.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorCancer VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMalePancreatic NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID28265583
PMCPMC5318641
OpenAlexW2586700760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.