ArticleWorld journal of diabetes2017
Fuzzy expert system for diagnosing diabetic neuropathy.
Article in World journal of diabetes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revolutionizing diabetes care: the role of artificial intelligence in prevention, diagnosis, and patient care.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Review
- Review
- Is It Possible to Analyze Kidney Functions, Electrolytes and Volemia Using Artificial Intelligence?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Diabetes Education and Management: Present Status and Promising Prospect.Frontiers in public health · 2020Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: a Focused Literature Survey.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2019Review
- Transforming Diabetes Care Through Artificial Intelligence: The Future Is Here.Population health management · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo design a fuzzy expert system to help detect and diagnose the severity of diabetic neuropathy.
methodsThe research was completed in 2014 and consisted of two main phases. In the first phase, the diagnostic parameters were determined based on the literature review and by investigating specialists' perspectives (
resultsThe final diagnostic parameters included the duration of diabetes, the score of a symptom examination based on the Michigan questionnaire, the score of a sign examination based on the Michigan questionnaire, the glycolysis haemoglobin level, fasting blood sugar, blood creatinine, and albuminuria. The output variable was the severity of diabetic neuropathy which was shown as a number between zero and 10, had been divided into four categories: absence of the disease, (the degree of severity) mild, moderate, and severe. The interface of the system was designed by ASP.Net (Active Server Pages Network Enabled Technology) and the system function was tested in terms of sensitivity (true positive rate) (89%), specificity (true negative rate) (98%), and accuracy (a proportion of true results, both positive and negative) (93%).
conclusionThe system designed in this study can help specialists and general practitioners to diagnose the disease more quickly to improve the quality of care for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.