ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017
Chloroplast Genome Analysis of Resurrection Tertiary Relict
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis and comparison of chloroplast genome codon usage patterns in five accessions of Toxicodendron vernicifluum.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Chloroplast genomes provide new insights into the phylogeny and evolution of the genus Hibiscus L.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Complete Chloroplast Genome Characterization, and Phylogenetic Analyses of the Rare and Endangered PlantBiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Development of molecular markers for marker-assisted breeding and quality evaluation of Aconitum carmichaelii cultivars.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Reconstructing the evolutionary trajectory of Chamaelirium (Melanthiaceae) through phylogenomics: insights from plastome dynamics and historical biogeography.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary genetics analysis for complete plastomes and diversification rate estimation of Deutzia and Philadelphus in tribe Philadelpheae (Hydrangeaceae).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetics of Chloroplasts Reveal Lower Rates of Genetic Variation in Mango (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- The complete plastome of the Antarctic moss Andreaea regularis (Andreaeaceae) and its comparative analyses within Bryophyta.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Comparative Genomics and Phylogenetic Analyses ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Chloroplast genomic insights into adaptive evolution and rapid radiation in the genus Passiflora (Passifloraceae).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- The plastid genome and phylogenetic status ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
- Molecular phylogenetic relationships based on chloroplast genomes of Zingiberaceae species: Insights into evolution and adaptation to extreme environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of confusingFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
- Comprehensive comparative analysis and development of molecular markers for Lasianthus species based on complete chloroplast genome sequences.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Comparative chloroplast genome analysis of Ardisia (Myrsinoideae, Primulaceae) in China and implications for phylogenetic relationships and adaptive evolution.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Phylogenomics and plastome evolution of Lithospermeae (Boraginaceae).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Article
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.