ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2017
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological characteristics, human cell interaction mechanisms, and differential clinical outcomes of infection by Brucella melitensis, Brucella abortus, Brucella suis, and Brucella canis.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Brucellar spondylitis is associated with disturbance in gut microbiota and histamine metabolism associated inflammation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Development of a predictive model based on ultrasonographic features of brucella-associated periarthritis of the shoulder.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- The atypical quorum sensing system of classicalJournal of bacteriology · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Article
- Rare and unexpected cause for isolated massive pericardial effusion in a patient with end-stage renal disease-Brucellosis.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- The role of CXCR3 and its ligands expression in Brucellar spondylitis.BMC immunology · 2020Article
- Interaction of Brucella abortus with Osteoclasts: a Step toward Understanding Osteoarticular Brucellosis and Vaccine Safety.Infection and immunity · 2020Article
- Dendritic cells and Brucella spp. interaction: the sentinel host and the stealthy pathogen.Folia microbiologica · 2020Review
- Mitochondrial fragmentation affects neither the sensitivity to TNFα-induced apoptosis of Brucella-infected cells nor the intracellular replication of the bacteria.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Inhibition of Osteoblast Function byFrontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Variability in the response of canine and human dendritic cells stimulated with Brucella canis.Veterinary research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarticular brucellosis is the most common presentation of human active disease although its prevalence varies widely. The three most common forms of osteoarticular involvement are sacroiliitis, spondylitis, and peripheral arthritis. The molecular mechanisms implicated in bone damage have been recently elucidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.