ArticleDer Onkologe : Organ der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft e.V2016
[Epidemiology, prevention and early detection of cervical cancer].
Article in Der Onkologe : Organ der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft e.V, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Epidemiology of Cervical Cancer in Germany: A Registry-Based Analysis of Incidence, Survival, and Tumor Characteristics (2003–2021).Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Observational
- First Results for the Evaluation of the Cervical Cancer Screening Carried Out in 2021 and 2022 in the Context of the Organized Cancer Screening Program (oKFE): Part 1 - Primary Screening.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA in patients with ASCUS.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- "Withstanding ambivalence is of particular importance"-Controversies among experts on dealing with desire to die in palliative care.PloS one · 2021Article
- The role of EP-2 receptor expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersistent infections with human papillomaviruses are a necessary cause of cervical carcinomas. The development of HPV-based prevention tools, HPV vaccination and HPV testing, is leading to major changes in cervical cancer prevention programs worldwide. A decade after introduction of HPV vaccination in many countries reductions of HPV infections and cancer precursors have been observed in young women. The focus is now on the integration of new approaches for screening of increasingly vaccinated populations. RESULTS AND
conclusionsA successful cervical cancer prevention program includes primary screening, triage of screen-positives, and colposcopy-biopsy to identify women with cancer precursors who require treatment. The role of primary screening is to identify a small subset of women with increased risk of cervical precancer, while the majority of women can be reassured that their risk is very low. Depending on the primary screening test, additional triage testing is required to decide who should be referred to colposcopy. Currently, there are three major approaches to cervical cancer screening: Cervical cytology, HPV testing, and HPV-cytology co-testing. Several triage tests for HPV-positive women are currently being evaluated, including cytology, HPV genotyping, p16/Ki-67 cytology and various methylation tests. Due to the increasing number of options for cervical cancer screening, it is challenging to keep screening guidelines current and comprehensible. The increasing complexity can lead to confusion among providers and women who participate in screening programs about the best approaches. Precision prevention is a novel approach to cervical cancer screening that integrates individual medical history with test results for unified, risk-based management decisions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.