Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28265099›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Neonatal

Xin Su, Jing-Jing Chen, Lin-Yun Liu, Qian Huang, Li-Zhao Zhang, Xiao-Yang Li, Xiang-Nan He, Wenlian Lu, Shan Sun, Huawei Li and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. COInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xin SuInstitutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jing-Jing ChenInstitutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Lin-Yun LiuInstitutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Qian HuangInstitutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Li-Zhao ZhangInstitutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xiao-Yang LiInstitutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xiang-Nan HeCentre for Computational Systems Biology and the School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Wenlian LuCentre for Computational Systems Biology and the School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Shan SunDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hearing Research Institute, Research Center, Affiliated Eye and Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Institutes of Biomedical Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China.
Huawei LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Hearing Research Institute, Research Center, Affiliated Eye and Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Institutes of Biomedical Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China.
Yong-Chun YuInstitutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; ycyu@fudan.edu.cn.
Fudan University · CNState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical coupling between excitatory neurons in the neocortex is developmentally regulated. It is initially prominent but eliminated at later developmental stages when chemical synapses emerge. However, it remains largely unclear whether early electrical coupling networks broadly contribute to neocortical circuit formation and animal behavior. Here, we report that neonatal electrical coupling between neocortical excitatory neurons is critical for proper neuronal development, synapse formation, and animal behavior. Conditional deletion of

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAnxietyBehavior, AnimalConnexin 26DendritesDendritic SpinesDisease Models, AnimalExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFemaleGene DeletionMiceMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicNeocortexConnexin 26anxietyCX26developmentneocortex

Identifiers

PMID28265099
PMCPMC5373364
OpenAlexW2593319303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.