Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28264846›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Substantial Impact of Altered Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients on the Antibacterial Effects of Meropenem Evaluated via the Dynamic Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Phillip J Bergen, Jürgen B Bulitta, Carl M J Kirkpatrick, Kate E Rogers, Megan J McGregor, Steven C Wallis, David L Paterson, Roger L Nation, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason A Roberts and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Phillip J BergenCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jürgen B BulittaCenter for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Carl M J KirkpatrickCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kate E RogersCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Megan J McGregorCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Steven C WallisBurns, Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David L PatersonThe University of Queensland Center for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Roger L NationDrug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jeffrey LipmanBurns, Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Jason A RobertsBurns, Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Cornelia B LandersdorferCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia cornelia.landersdorfer@monash.edu.
Monash University · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critically ill patients frequently have substantially altered pharmacokinetics compared to non-critically ill patients. We investigated the impact of pharmacokinetic alterations on bacterial killing and resistance for commonly used meropenem dosing regimens. A

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCreatinineCritical IllnessDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansKidney Function TestsMaleMeropenemMetabolic Clearance RateMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonte Carlo MethodPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsThienamycinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCreatinineMeropenemThienamycinsaugmented renal clearancecritically illpharmacodynamic modelingpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID28264846
PMCPMC5404522
OpenAlexW2592339885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.