Observational studyBMJ open2017
Impact of gender on event rates at 1 year in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation: contemporary perspective from the GARFIELD-AF registry.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01090362 (Prospective, Multi Centre, International Registry of Male and Female Patients Newly Diagnosed With Atrial Fibrillation.), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective, Multi Centre, International Registry of Male and Female Patients Newly Diagnosed With Atrial Fibrillation.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- National Heart Center/Saudi Heart Association 2025 Guidelines for Cardiovascular Diseases Prevention and Risk Assessment.Saudi medical journal · 2026Guideline
- Sex disparities in enrollment and reporting of outcomes by sex in contemporary clinical trials of atrial fibrillation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2022Pooled it
- Sex Differences in Thrombin Generation in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.Translational stroke research · 2025Article
- Women have less progression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: data from the RACE V study.Open heart · 2023Article
- Is the association between cognitive disease progression and atrial fibrillation modified by sex?Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023Article
- Initial In-Hospital Visit-to-Visit Heart Rate Variability Is Associated with Higher Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Gender Differences in Atrial Fibrillation: From the Thromboembolic Risk to the Anticoagulant Treatment Response.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Article
- Sex Differences in Efficacy and Safety After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 4.3-Year Follow-Up Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Stroke risk factors and outcomes among hospitalized women with atrial fibrillation.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2021Observational
- Women and atrial fibrillation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2021Review
- Article
- Impact of gender: Rivaroxaban for patients with atrial fibrillation in the XANTUS real-world prospective study.Clinical cardiology · 2020Observational
- Female Sex as a Thromboembolic Risk Factor in the Era of Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2020Review
- Atrial fibrillation-related stroke in women: Evidence and inequalities in epidemiology, mechanisms, clinical presentation, and management.Clinical cardiology · 2020Review
- Risk of ischemic stroke and utility of CHAClinical cardiology · 2019Article
- Comparative effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus a vitamin K antagonist in patients with renal impairment treated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Germany - A retrospective cohort study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2019Article
- Antithrombotic treatment patterns in patients with atrial fibrillation in Italy pre- and post-DOACs: the REPAIR study.Future cardiology · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesGlobal Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) explored the impact of gender, risk factors and anticoagulant (AC) treatment on 1-year outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).
designGARFIELD-AF is a prospective non-interventional registry.
settingInvestigator sites (n=1048) are representative of the care settings/locations in each of the 35 countries.
participantsPatients ≥18yrs with newly diagnosed (≤6 weeks' duration) NVAF and ≥1 investigator-determined stroke risk factors.
main outcome measuresEvent rates per 100 person-years were estimated from the Poisson model and HRs and 95% CIs calculated.
resultsOf 28 624 patients (women 44.4%; men 55.6%) enrolled, there were more elderly (≥75 years) women (46.9%) than men (30.4%). All-cause mortality rates per 100 person-years (95% CI) for women and men were 4.48 (4.12 to 4.87) and 4.04 (3.74 to 4.38), respectively, stroke/systemic embolism (SE) (1.62 (1.41 to 1.87) and 1.17 (1.01 to 1.36)) and major bleeding (0.93 (0.78 to 1.13) and 0.79 (0.66 to 0.95)). After adjustment for baseline risk factors in treated and untreated patients, HRs (95% CI) for women (relative to men) for stroke/SE rates were 1.3-fold higher in women (HR 1.30 (1.04 to 1.63)), and similar for major bleeding (1.13 (0.85 to 1.50)) and all-cause mortality (1.05 (0.92 to 1.19)). Antithrombotic treatment patterns in men and women were almost identical. 63.8% women and 62.9% men received AC± antiplatelets. Relative to no AC treatment, the reduction in stroke/SE rates with AC treatment was greater (p=0.01) in men (HR 0.45 (0.33 to 0.61)) than women 0.77 (0.57 to 1.03). All-cause mortality reduction with AC treatment was similar (women: 0.65 (0.54 to 0.77); men: 0.57 (0.48 to 0.68)). The risk of major bleeding when treated with AC versus no AC was 2.33 (1.41 to 3.84) in men and 1.86 (1.16 to 2.99) in women (p value=0.53).
conclusionsWomen have a higher risk of stroke/SE and the reduction in stroke/SE events rates with AC treatment is less in women than in men. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01090362.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.