Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28264564›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2017

Quantitative Analysis of Synthetic Cell Lineage Tracing Using Nuclease Barcoding.

Stephanie Tzouanas Schmidt, Stephanie M Zimmerman, Jianbin Wang, Stuart K Kim, Stephen R Quake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advances in CRISPR-Cas9 in lineage tracing of model animals.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A New Generation of Lineage Tracing Dynamically Records Cell Fate Choices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Nucleic acid cleavage with a hyperthermophilic Cas9 from an uncultured Ignavibacterium.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Integrative single-cell analysis.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Maps of variability in cell lineage trees.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie Tzouanas SchmidtDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3560-5782
Stephanie M ZimmermanDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Jianbin WangDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Stuart K KimDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Stephen R QuakeDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Interrogation of individual cells to identify progenitor cells and their nichesU01HL099995 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KRASNOW, MARK A · 2009 to 2015
$7.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099995NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lineage tracing by the determination and mapping of progeny arising from single cells is an important approach enabling the elucidation of mechanisms underlying diverse biological processes ranging from development to disease. We developed a dynamic sequence-based barcode system for synthetic lineage tracing and have demonstrated its performance in C. elegans, a model organism whose lineage tree is well established. The strategy we use creates lineage trees based upon the introduction of synthetically controlled mutations into cells and the propagation of these mutations to daughter cells at each cell division. We analyzed this experimental proof of concept along with a corresponding simulation and analytical model to gain a deeper understanding of the coding capacity of the system. Our results provide specific bounds on the fidelity of lineage tracing using such approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCell LineageCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, HelminthINDEL MutationModels, GeneticSynthetic BiologyDNA, HelminthCRISPR/Cas9DNA barcodinglineage tracing

Identifiers

PMID28264564
PMCPMC5724935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.